govinda indian fan
International Debutant
Who do you think is is greatest bat to tour india
imo Barrington is worse in India.And I really don't know why Viv's there - his record in India is fine but nowhere near among the best ever.
Flower played similar quality Indian bowling with regards to spin. Pace bowling was definitely better in Flower's days. And Flower was the lonely man. Lloyd had Viv and Kallicharran. Flower, Barrington, Sobers and Lloyd all are par for me. Lloyd was the most brutal out of them when it came to hitting, so he has the points.Flower was godlike but Lloyd was godlike for longer and okayed against better bowling
Flower's wickets were exceptionally flatter.Flower played similar quality Indian bowling with regards to spin. Pace bowling was definitely better in Flower's days. And Flower was the lonely man. Lloyd had Viv and Kallicharran. Flower, Barrington, Sobers and Lloyd all are par for me. Lloyd was the most brutal out of them when it came to hitting, so he has the points.
Could you provide the numbers of Compton in India? He has really good numbers in FC matches in SC.Lloyd's predecessor in Sir Frank Worrell never played representing West Indies in India as far as I know, but he represented the British commonwealth XI in India in 1949-1950-1951, playing against what was the first choice test team at the time in unofficial test matches, here were his numbers.
1,231 runs @ 72.41 with 9 fifties and 3 hundreds in 20 innings.
33 wickets @ 31.5, and bowled 40+ overs and 50+ overs at times.
India won the serieses but still.
As far as I know, Compton only played Domestic Cricket in India and not unofficial tests so hard to say how it'd translate to direct Test Cricket, so not really compareable to Worrell. But, Hassett, Sutcliffe, Hobbs, Duleep all also only played FC so you can definitely say he outdid them in India by a pretty large margin.Could you provide the numbers of Compton in India? He has really good numbers in FC matches in SC.
Compton 1306 runs @ 87.06; 7 centuries
Hassett 826 @ 82.60; 4 centuries
Duleepsinhji 301 @ 75.25; 1 century
Rhodes 599 @ 66.55; 2 centuries
Worrell 4373 @ 64.30; 14 centuries
H Sutcliffe 523 @ 59.11; 2 centuries
Hobbs 593 @ 53.90; 2 centuries
source: peterhrt
Batting average of both teamsFlower's wickets were exceptionally flatter.
is this just for Zimbabwe/West Indies or is India included too?Batting average of both teams
Flower's matches 29.41
Lloyd's matches 35.4
Not actually.
India included. Otherwise it is heavily biased. I hope my tinkering with Statsguru was correctis this just for Zimbabwe/West Indies or is India included too?
This is what I'm getting teams wiseIndia included. Otherwise it is heavily biased. I hope my tinkering with Statsguru was correct