Forgot him. AddedIf the inclusion of Arshad wasn't for ****s and giggles I'll be bloody disappointed.
Also well done on omitting Ajmal.
Pervez Sajjad also averaged way under 30.Only one averaging below 30, which is telling even though their pitches (and pitches for spinners in general since covering became common) are quite tough.
It's all very well claiming statsguru lacks context and watching players at the time gives a better understanding of their skill set. But when a highly rated player has virtually no success throughout their entire career you have to call into question the credibility of that common consensus. Abdul Qadir's away record was not "a bit more expensive" but absolutely appalling (68 wickets @ 48, with an average of over 40 in every overseas country in which he played more than 3 Tests), and orders of magnitude worse than several other Pakistani spinners such as Saqlain Mushtaq.Abdul Qadir was great at the time because high quality leg spinners were a rarity. It was generally accepted pre-Warne that leg spinners could be a bit more expensive than off spinners. To look at stats guru and conclude he was no good is doing him a great disservice.
The original uncle.. Deserves to be in the HoF for that. These pretend uncles should learn a thing or two from him.If the inclusion of Arshad