• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Trescothick in cheating revelation!

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
The proof:

Pre-mints - dire.
With mints and Trescothick - knock over Australia, win Ashes.
Post-mints - couldn't beat time with a stick
:ph34r:
Didn't England spend the year before the Ashes series in question not losing a Test against anyone?
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
With mints mate, with mints.

My inquiries continue, with the fellas behind the September 11 conspiracy websites confirming it was mints and nothing else which won England those tests.
 

James_W

U19 Vice-Captain
Rumour has it sweets were also used on the bats, so after the ball was struck it would swing away from the fielders, giving England countless undeserved runs.
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Rumour has it sweets were also used on the bats, so after the ball was struck it would swing away from the fielders, giving England countless undeserved runs.
Clearly the commentators were in on it. I remember many times the remark "That was sweetly timed" in relation to English batsmen. The story is unravelling fast, I have the Jade Monkey. If anything happens to me, tell my wife I love......... *URK* The sweets.........were............POISONED!
 
Last edited:

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Clearly the commentators were in on it. I remember many times the remark "That was sweetly timed" in relation to English batsmen. The story is unravelling fast, I have the Jade Monkey. If anything happens to me, tell my wife I love......... *URK* The sweets.........were............POISONED!
The awful truth. I expect a Mike Moore doco on this travesty any day now.

And don't forget when they made a mockery of the whole thing last year, laughing in the face of the erstwhile, honest administrators of the ICC, by tossing sweets at the feet of an Indian batsman during a test match.
 

James_W

U19 Vice-Captain
Clearly the commentators were in on it. I remember many times the remark "That was sweetly timed" in relation to English batsmen. The story is unravelling fast, I have the Jade Monkey. If anything happens to me, tell my wife I love......... *URK* The sweets.........were............POISONED!
Sweetly timed.:-O The clues were right in front of us, how could we be so blind to the truth!
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
The awful truth. I expect a Mike Moore doco on this travesty any day now.

And don't forget when they made a mockery of the whole thing last year, laughing in the face of the erstwhile, honest administrators of the ICC, by tossing sweets at the feet of an Indian batsman during a test match.
Clearly, nothing short of an apology to KRudd from the Queen will suffice.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Rumour has it sweets were also used on the bats, so after the ball was struck it would swing away from the fielders, giving England countless undeserved runs.
so that's what Mark Nicholas meant by "sweet timing"??????????? ;) :p




EDIT: Juz read T_C has beat me to it.. damn!! :)
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Haha we need CW awards this week so Burgey can have the skull. LMAO @ the bus going backwards while crims pelt them with mints! :lol:
 

Matt79

Hall of Fame Member
Reap as ye sow kids - the cricketing gods have certainly wreaked their vengence against Jones, Flintoff and Minty if you look at their runs of injuries and health problems since.

Alternatively Trecothick being unavailable for selection spookily echoes Larwood's career being ended by his role in cheating a better team out of a rightful win.
 

pasag

RTDAS
Reap as ye sow kids - the cricketing gods have certainly wreaked their vengence against Jones, Flintoff and Minty if you look at their runs of injuries and health problems since.

Alternatively Trecothick being unavailable for selection spookily echoes Larwood's career being ended by his role in cheating a better team out of a rightful win.
Highly debatable whether Australia's Bodyline team was better than England's.
 

pasag

RTDAS
Actually, Jones' was really a resounding denial - "Well, they'd do it too, wouldn't they?" I think was the quote.

Well, I've seen it now, and the horrible, malevolent truth is now in the open. :@

My suspicions have been confirmed, and I expect wholesale apologies form the likes of Dickinson who lampooned me for suggesting this was all true. Mind you, I expect hell to freeze over soon too.

Hand back the Ashes from 05 - the only fair punishment for this treachery. Hand back the MBEs and OBEs - acquired by nefarious means that they were. Make the open-top double decker bus go backwards from Trafalgar Square down The Strand, while ex-pat Aussies throw bags of mints and cakes of soap at these cheating so-and-sos, all the while reminding them that the only way they've gotten close in 20 years was the use of illegal sweets.

Then come the law suits. I, for one, plan on leading a class action against the ECB, Vaughan, Flintoff, Trescothick and S Jones for damages for sleep deprivation and depression suffered as a result of the sudden loss of what was rightly ours. All those sleepless nights wondering how a side which struggled for nigh on two decades to get the ball to the other end of the pitch suddenly made the bloody ball talk Swahili as it went past the bemused bastmen. I expect to recover millions.

Not as much as Damien Martyn and Simon Katich though, whose careers were cut short as a result of falling to this outrageous connivance, and therefore lost so much dough from their contracts and endorsements that it wasn't funny.

Given the level of treachery and the heinous nature of the crimes involved, the only appropriate venue for these trials is either The Hague or Nuremburg.

On the positive note for England though, given the reliance on confectionary, they ought to appoint Willie Wonka the new captain, with the CEO of Cadbury-Schweppes as VC.

It goes far deeper than just cricket though.

If you check the footage from the Olympics, in every event where an Englishman or woman finished ahead of an Australian, they were seen sucking mints. Yes, that's right!!! All those cyclists sucking on mints, then spitting on the chains of their bikes to continue England's latest sporting program - Enhanced Performance Optimisation, or "EPO" as it has become known in the wider community. :ph34r:

This is just the beginning, I tell you.

Investigations into the use of sticky gum during the Rugby WC of 2003 are just getting underway, with early results confirming the sudden ability of English players to hang on to the ball was as a result of applying illegal gum to their hands just before kick off.

A similar examination of archival footage reveals Geoff Hurst imbibed of an obscene amount of boiled sweets before the final of the 1966 WC v West Germany.

Before long each of these sporting successes will be rightfully expunged from England's sporting history. It's no more than they deserve.
:laugh:
 

pup11

International Coach
Reap as ye sow kids - the cricketing gods have certainly wreaked their vengence against Jones, Flintoff and Minty if you look at their runs of injuries and health problems since.

Alternatively Trecothick being unavailable for selection spookily echoes Larwood's career being ended by his role in cheating a better team out of a rightful win.
Couldn't agree with this anymore.:laugh:
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
I'd say it was reasonably better myself, tbh. Also considering that Bradman missed the 1st Test.
Disagree completely. Bradman aside I don't think too many of the rest of the Aussie XI would've made our team. McCabe for Leyland & one of O'Reilly or Grimmett for Verity, possibly, but that would be it.

In fact it's been suggested in some quarters that at least part of the reason bodyline was deployed was that the Aussie seamers weren't half as quick as ours were.
 

Goughy

Hall of Fame Member
I'd say it was reasonably better myself, tbh. Also considering that Bradman missed the 1st Test.
Not a chance. There was no seam bowling. Tiger O'Reilly opened.

It was a good Aussie team but a great English XI. One of the criticisms leveled at Jardine over the years is that he used Bodyline when it wasnt needed. Sure it won the Ashes, but many believe he would have had the same success with 'normal' cricket.

England were pretty equally matched in the top order, batted far deeper (Ames at 9 :-O), were far stronger in seam bowling and had a spinner arguably the equal anything Australia had.
 
Last edited:

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Not a chance. There was no seam bowling. Tiger O'Reilly opened.

It was a good Aussie team but a great English XI. One of the criticisms leveled at Jardine over the years is that he used Bodyline when it wasnt needed. Sure it won the Ashes, but he would have had the same success with 'normal' cricket.

England were pretty equally matched in the top order, batted far deeper (Ames at 9 :-O), were far stronger in seam bowling and had a spinner arguably the equal anything Australia had.
It's an interesting point, actually. I'm inclined to think Bradman would've scored a lot more heavily, but we certainly might've carried the day anyway, yes.

The fall-out from 32/33 agruably cost us the next series too, as it robbed us of our best seamer & the best captain we've ever had, hastened into test exile by the typically perfidious MCC. Although whether Larwood would've been the same bowler after his foot injury is another debate in itself, I suppose.
 

Perm

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Disagree completely. Bradman aside I don't think too many of the rest of the Aussie XI would've made our team. McCabe for Leyland & one of O'Reilly or Grimmett for Verity, possibly, but that would be it.
Woodfull and Ponsford would both be superior options to partnering Sutcliffe at the top of the order than either of Wyatt or Jardine were throughout the series and it was only due to the leg-theory that Harold Larwood was so effective IMO. Under ordinary circumstances I would consider O'Reilly and Grimmett as far superior to all of the English bowlers on display in 32/33.

Bradman was effectively two batsmen, even if he could 'only' average in the 50's against Larwood and Voce.
 

Top