Flem274*
123/5
What on earth are they based on?
My NZ batting line up is rated four stars, with all the top six averaging over 40, three over 50 and one (Fulton) over 60, yet for example; the Aussie line up has two over 40 and the rest are in the thirties. Despite this, they have a five star line up. Its not as though I have a long tail either, with Franklin at 8 or 9 averaging 30.
I don't get it, my batting line up is arguably the best in my game, yet I have a lesser star rating for it than half the teams.
I won't talk about my bowling rating, I deserve it. James Franklin is the only reason I've scraped above two stars. WAG bowler.
My NZ batting line up is rated four stars, with all the top six averaging over 40, three over 50 and one (Fulton) over 60, yet for example; the Aussie line up has two over 40 and the rest are in the thirties. Despite this, they have a five star line up. Its not as though I have a long tail either, with Franklin at 8 or 9 averaging 30.
I don't get it, my batting line up is arguably the best in my game, yet I have a lesser star rating for it than half the teams.
I won't talk about my bowling rating, I deserve it. James Franklin is the only reason I've scraped above two stars. WAG bowler.