• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* English Football Season 2010-11

Cevno

Hall of Fame Member
See our U19s managed to fluke their way to the European semis thanks to two late goals: an injury time equaliser versus Johnny Frenchy and Austria converting an 87th minute pen to beat the Dutch. :happy:

Probably get our arses handed to us by Spain tho but.
I caught a bit of the match between England and Holland on a stream .

The English were pretty bad and were getting dominated by the dutch.
 
Last edited:

Furball

Evil Scotsman
Dunno if you've noticed but there's more than one position on a football field.

Most of the France World Cup winning team (defenders and midfielders) would be ahead of Chief Cheateur for starters. Then you can look at other World Cup winning teams. Then you've got players who, like Chief Cheateur, haven't done a great deal on the international stage (whether it be because the international side is a bit rubbish, or otherwise) but are more impressive for their club team (Messi and Ronaldo being obvious ones).
Like a guy who scored a record number of goals for his club and regularly topped the goalscoring charts in England in the early-mid 00s?
 

cpr

International Coach
Like a guy who scored a record number of goals for his club and regularly topped the goalscoring charts in England in the early-mid 00s?
Thats not going to make him a legend though, because when he's gone, he'll soon get forgot, give it 10 years and no one will care much for him, bar those who he performed for. Sure some will recall him, just like our generation recall players like Le Tissier..... He's not going to transcend more than that in my eyes, and thats why he's not going to be a legend.

Kids are not going to be there in 20 years time wishing they'd got to see him at his peak, like they do with Pele, Maradona, Best, Edwards. They'll accept he was a great player, but thats it.

Look at the 70's for a prime example, people put Cruyff as the legend of the era, yet only give a nod on the side to Gerd Muller, who only had to think about the goal to score
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Thats not going to make him a legend though, because when he's gone, he'll soon get forgot, give it 10 years and no one will care much for him, bar those who he performed for. Sure some will recall him, just like our generation recall players like Le Tissier..... He's not going to transcend more than that in my eyes, and thats why he's not going to be a legend.

Kids are not going to be there in 20 years time wishing they'd got to see him at his peak, like they do with Pele, Maradona, Best, Edwards. They'll accept he was a great player, but thats it.

Look at the 70's for a prime example, people put Cruyff as the legend of the era, yet only give a nod on the side to Gerd Muller, who only had to think about the goal to score
Depends how high you set the bar. But I can say with confidence that Henry will thought of much, much more highly in twenty years than Gerd Muller is now. Whether you agree with their assessment or not, there's a decent chunk of people my age and younger who think Henry is the best player they've ever seen.
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Well, I think Henry is among the top 3-5 players of the last decade. Whether that entitles him to legend status or not is down to opinion.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Depends how high you set the bar. But I can say with confidence that Henry will thought of much, much more highly in twenty years than Gerd Muller is now. Whether you agree with their assessment or not, there's a decent chunk of people my age and younger who think Henry is the best player they've ever seen.
Henry was great, but he's not even the best player to have played for his club in these people's time- Bergkamp was better, IMO
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Henry was great, but he's not even the best player to have played for his club in these people's time- Bergkamp was better, IMO
Bergkamp's a tough player to compare with anyone else, it kinda depends how you define "better". There's something special about Bergkamp; he had moments of genius that couldn't have been done by anyone else in the history of the game. But I'd rather play against him than Henry. Jesus, it's not even close. The thought of playing Henry scares the **** out of me. He scored and set up an utterly obscene amount of goals.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
It depends who's already in your team though. You'd prefer Bergkamp to partner Anelka but you'd prefer Henry to partner Cantona. It really isn't that easy.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I don't even think it's close ftr. Bergkamp's contributions are more subtle which can make him a bit underrated at times. But there's no way such contributions could possibly add up to more than the vaaaast difference in goals scored and created. Soooo many goals. 2002/03- 37 games, 24 goals, 23 assists. 2003/04- 37 games, 30 goals, 9 assists. 2004/05- 32 games, 25 goals, 15 assists. The guy was an absolute freak.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Stats in football, ugh.

Obviously Henry would score more goals. I just think Bergkamp was better. Complete footballing genius, candidate for best Prem player of all-time.

Be interesting if the Arse fans agree with me though.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I'd say he's moreso a footballing genius than a great footballer.

As much as I agree re: stats in football, the number of goals Henry scored and made at his peak was just too ****ing vast. He'd do it almost every match.

Anyway, as I've said before, the two best players of the Premiership were Vieira and Keane imo. There are great goalscorers and skilful forwards in every era but there's not really any modern equivalent of those two. When you look at who the great central midfielders in the Premiership from before and after those two are, you couldn't even make a case for any of them being in the same league.
 

Ikki

Hall of Fame Member
I'd say he's moreso a footballing genius than a great footballer.

As much as I agree re: stats in football, the number of goals Henry scored and made at his peak was just too ****ing vast. He'd do it almost every match.

Anyway, as I've said before, the two best players of the Premiership were Vieira and Keane imo. There are great goalscorers and skilful forwards in every era but there's not really any modern equivalent of those two. When you look at who the great central midfielders in the Premiership from before and after those two are, you couldn't even make a case for any of them being in the same league.
Gerrard, easily. Even Sir Red Nose has said it and made comparisons. In fact, he was much more influential/important to his side and even more talented than them. But the problem with that kind of comparison is really the death of the box-to-box midfielder. Fewer and fewer teams play a 4-4-2 and few have two box-to-box midfielders these days. Even the ones like Gerrard and Lampard are more specialised rather than being all-rounders these days.

Stats in football, ugh.

Obviously Henry would score more goals. I just think Bergkamp was better. Complete footballing genius, candidate for best Prem player of all-time.

Be interesting if the Arse fans agree with me though.
Don't think I would have ever considered Bergkamp to be in the top 3 players at any given time in his career whereas Henry was for a chunk of his. Personally, don't think it's even that close.


Bergkamp's a tough player to compare with anyone else, it kinda depends how you define "better". There's something special about Bergkamp; he had moments of genius that couldn't have been done by anyone else in the history of the game. But I'd rather play against him than Henry. Jesus, it's not even close. The thought of playing Henry scares the **** out of me. He scored and set up an utterly obscene amount of goals.
Agree, as aforesaid, his 02-03 season is something I haven't seen anyone get near. Not even the Ronaldo 42 goal season gets near it. He was the devil incarnate and destroyed defenses.
 
Last edited:

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
I do agree the Gerrard at his peak definitely fits the Viera/Keane mold. Criminally underrated by a lot of visitors to this thread IMO. Stick Gerrard in the teams that those two played in and see what happens.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Don't think I would have ever considered Bergkamp to be in the top 3 players at any given time in his career whereas Henry was for a chunk of his. Personally, don't think it's even that close.
Who was better than him between, say, 97 and the early 00s?

Uppercut's aforementioned midfield two are probably the only ones that warrant a mention here. I'm probably criminally forgetting someone though.
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Gerrard, easily. Even Sir Red Nose has said it and made comparisons. In fact, he was much more influential/important to his side and even more talented than them. But the problem with that kind of comparison is really the death of the box-to-box midfielder. Fewer and fewer teams play a 4-4-2 and few have two box-to-box midfielders these days. Even the ones like Gerrard and Lampard are more specialised rather than being all-rounders these days.
I don't agree. Gerrard might have been more influential to Liverpool than those two to their clubs (debatable), but as midfielders I'd take Keane and Vieira everytime over Gerrard. Maybe I didn't watch enough of Gerrard before Benitez but I think he takes the over-ambitious option far too often to be a truly great CM.
 

Top