Brad McNamara @bbuzzmc
Will say this once and then nothing else. Defamation laws quite clear in Aus.be careful.
**** sake, how do you not understand this? The existing players have cost of living in their contracts. In five years time those contracts don't exist any more. Then they will be able to give Franklin the entire 900k towards his yearly salary and deal with the players they need to contract with their primary cap.
Players don't have contracts which have the same value year in and year out. Some are front ended, some are back ended, some are constant throughout.
THEY ARE ONLY ABLE TO OFFER LANCE FRANKLIN 9 YEARS AT THAT VALUE DUE TO THE ALLOWANCE.
Is that clear enough for you?
Come and Paint Turtle
00 fuming nobody wants to live in north melbourne so its ch33p az
guys stop fighting please
skidmark00 to be fuming when NDS decides to take his talents to bondi beach
Cale Hooker @Hooksy26 4m
If Buddy goes to Sydney surely they will stop showing that replay of me chasing him down the wing?! @AFL360 #newjumper #newteam
Cale attempting to reach the heights of ajdude and benchmark00
It got read out on 360 ftr.
Why do the changes to the Vets list help them? They only have 5 vets next year (Goodes, Malceski,McVeigh, O'Keefe, LRT) so their total saving is about 550K - under the old agreement they would have had a third of Goodes, O'Keefe and LRT's salarys - maybe slightly less than 550K but nothing massive
Only 2 Vets allowed under the old system iirc. Def. create some cash
Yes but it was half the wage. So say Goodes and O'Keefe were on a million combined.
That's 500k under the old system.
Now it's what, 550k combined?
last season they had 6 vets so it was 600K. not sure if they can add another one or not this off-season, but equally, unsure if their two vets under the old rules would have taken up 1 million combined anyway. I def think it's created some cash. Not enough to cancel out Buddy of course
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)