|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oslo
Posts: 22,255
|
Darrell Hair overshadowed?
I'm sure we all remember Ovalgate with great fondness...anyway, it's just had its football equivalent today.
Denmark hosted Sweden in a vital Euro qualifier, with Denmark pretty much needing a win to stay in the hunt with Sweden, Spain and Northern Ireland (hush). After going down 0-3 in the opening 25 minutes, Denmark fought back excellently (watched the whole match, definitely sided with Denmark - they were playing good football and deserved at least a point). Anyway, Denmark got back to 3-3, pushed forward, open game, both sides hunting the fourth... Then out of the blue Poulsen (Denmark) punches Rosenberg (Sweden striker) in the stomach, Rosenberg goes down, nobody except linesman notices until the ref blows his whistle for an injury in the box. Linesman's seen the incident though, and notifies the ref, who goes over for a quick chat before returning with the red card to Poulsen and a penalty to Sweden. Then a cracking night of football falls to pieces. One Danish spectator goes mad, runs onto pitch and attempts to assault the referee (who is saved by Danish defender Gravgaard, who went between). The referee points to the tunnel and orders the players to walk off, and after an Oval-style 10-minute rumination (at least UEFA are quicker than ICC to sort things out), Sweden are declared 3-0 winners, at least according to the scoreboard. Now it seems like there's going to be a disciplinary hearing. (For slightly more neutral news, see UEFA and BBC) Anyway, is it justified to walk off? I thought it was a bit of an overreaction - there was about four minutes left to play, it was just one nutter, the only reason I can see was that the referee thought there was a personal threat to himself - but this doesn't really increase with one guy running onto the pitch (let's face it, this happens all the time). Very, very strange.
__________________
Messi scores on the rebound. Founder of ESAS - Edgar Schiferli, the best associate bowler A follower of the schools of Machiavelli, Bentham, Locke, Hobbes, Sutcliffe, Bradman, Lindwall, Miller, Hassett and Benaud Member of JMAS, DMAS, FRAS and RTDAS Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Englishman
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Doing the stance
Posts: 42,622
|
The Viking blood still flows through you Scandinavians, eh?
![]() It's a tough one, personally I think when officials are physically attacked that's it, we might as well abandon sport & just have a fight, so I do have some sympathy with the ref's stance here. However, given he wasn't actually attacked common sense would suggest that, given that state of the game & that passions were running high (that Norse blood again), the penalty should have been taken & the game played to its natural conclusion.
__________________
- As featured in The Independent. "This is not the time for namby-pamby promising youngsters who might just do something; not the time for building for the future. Pragmatism rules and they don't come more pragmatic than Rogers." - Victor Marks makes the case for stiff-legged and stiff-armed 35 year old left-handers in Ashes squads |
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The return of Darrell Hair - well almost. | Lillian Thomson | Cricket Chat | 103 | 19-01-2007 12:39 PM |
| Is Darrell Hair Ok to be on the International Panel ? | JASON | Cricket Chat | 111 | 13-09-2006 01:28 PM |
| Jack Sparrow launches Katuysha Rockets at Darrell Hair | jack_sparrow | Cricket Chat | 3 | 24-08-2006 06:08 PM |