Batsman scores 100, he gets 30 points. Bowler takes 10 wickets, he gets 50 points.Hero_Don said:Mentioned how the with the points, a batsmen makes 100 runs, gets 100 points, bowler gets 10 wickets, gets 50 points.
Eh?Hero_Don said:Minus the bonus points.
For scoring a 100 a batsman would get 20 poinst for the runs + 10 points bonus = 30 points.Sudeep said:Eh?
I made an error myself. Bowler takes 10 wickets, he gets a hell lot of points more than a batsman scoring 100.
A thread is enough IMO. Anyone is welcome to create a specific thread for their User Comp.Ubsy said:How about adding a mini forum attached to each user competition?
This way we can sledge/give guidance to our friends directly.
I think this takes away the challenge of picking your very own team without relying on the guidance of others but that's just me.Ubsy said:I also agree with some previous threads about allowing people to see other teams. This system operates in most big fantasy leagues around the globe.
You would only be able to see their team AFTER the lockout has begun.
Could be done definately, but would need a rule around points lost, etc. I think it works well currently because no one can change their team while a match is in progress so no one from any specific time zone gets an advantage.Ubsy said:Just one more suggestion.....
How about a deduction points, from your total score for any excessive trades/changes during the trading period.
This will make people manage their trades a little more closely.
Thanks very much, tell your friendsUbsy said:P.S I think this is the best free Fantasy cricket site out there. Some improvements could make it even better!!!.
You can only make 1 anyway.Ubsy said:How about a deduction points, from your total score for any excessive trades/changes during the trading period.
This will make people manage their trades a little more closely.
Definitely - it would also allow unscrupulous people who are leading to mimic the teams challenging them in order to not be able to be overtaken.James said:I think this takes away the challenge of picking your very own team without relying on the guidance of others but that's just me.
What does everyone else think?
With only one change every five days & the normal length of the comps I don't think that would be a huge issue.marc71178 said:Definitely - it would also allow unscrupulous people who are leading to mimic the teams challenging them in order to not be able to be overtaken.
I agree. You would only show the team during the lockout period.BoyBrumby said:With only one change every five days & the normal length of the comps I don't think that would be a huge issue.
I think what he was referring to was opening it up so you can make as many changes as you like but say if you made 11 changes you'd lose 110 points, 10 for each change. That sort of thing. I could be misunderstood his suggestion though.marc71178 said:You can only make 1 anyway.
You are right James.James said:I think what he was referring to was opening it up so you can make as many changes as you like but say if you made 11 changes you'd lose 110 points, 10 for each change. That sort of thing. I could be misunderstood his suggestion though.