Cricket Betting Site Betway
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 33
Like Tree4Likes

Thread: Format

  1. #1
    Norwood's on Fire GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    League One
    Posts
    60,388

    Format

    Design your own. I've probably done this before in other tournaments. But the 24 team format does produce some oddities.

    When used in Italia 90 and USA 94, the losing finalists in each had finished third in their group (it was also used in 86. And tbf was probably an improvement on the three team second group stage of 82). Validation of the format or an insult to those who'd bothered their arses to show up for their group games?

    Anyway. How many teams should be in the Euros? And either way, with 24 or however many you'd choose, what should the format be?

    Quote Originally Posted by Axl Rose
    The internet is a big garbage can


    RIP Craigos. A true CW legend. You will be missed.

  2. #2
    rather mad Norwegian Magrat Garlick's Avatar
    Defend Your Castle Champion! Monkey Diving Champion!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    East Holland
    Posts
    26,397
    It was fine. 16 is a good number, it also means the players won't be too exhausted come the business end.

    If we are to have relentless expansion then the club leagues would have to be cut by a month and 2-4 teams.

    It also means the lower FAs really have very little incentive to improve their player education programme, as they basically have a 50-50 chance at the lottery of tournament money.

    I'm not entirely sure who is to blame for this but I believe it was the Celtic FAs who pushed hard for this at the UEFA congress, it wasn't a plan hatched in the dark lairs of Infantino/Platini.
    A follower of the schools of Machiavelli, Bentham, Locke, Hobbes, Sutcliffe, Bradman, Lindwall, Miller, Hassett, Benaud and Thunberg

    I had a glimpse of Eureka
    Chewing me up, chewing me up and spitting me out

    -jected, I was rejected
    I wasn't good enough to be elected
    Lava, it was like lava
    Moving through my body like fire

  3. #3
    Norwood's on Fire GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    League One
    Posts
    60,388
    So we can blame Furball, Uppercut and Nick-o?

  4. #4
    Norwood's on Fire GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    League One
    Posts
    60,388
    To be fair though, it's only one extra game per finalist. Surely shouldn't add a fatigue factor?
    Last edited by GIMH; 21-06-2016 at 03:41 PM.


  5. #5
    Evil Scotsman
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    away from here
    Posts
    31,129
    I've always felt that 16 was the sweet spot, surprisingly the standard this tournament hasn't felt worse but I think that's because the teams from about 14 to 24 are much of a muchness whereas in the 16 team format the worst couple of teams really stand out like a sore thumb.

    The group stage has suffered for it as there's been absokutely no tension whatsoever. Like I said elsewhere, if you want to stick to 24 then fine, but only the top 2 should qualify for knock out rounds. Best 4 winners to the quarters, other 8 teams play off for a place in the last 8.

  6. #6
    Norwood's on Fire GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    League One
    Posts
    60,388
    Tbh I don't like anything where your record in your group gives you an advantage over other groups.
    Magrat Garlick likes this.

  7. #7
    Evil Scotsman
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    away from here
    Posts
    31,129
    Agreed but I think it's a better solution than what we've gor just now.

  8. #8
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend flibbertyjibber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Mrs Miggins pie shop
    Posts
    22,380
    16 for euros is fine and 32 in a world cup while being more sees the world covered with qualifiers quite well.

    I dread the day when they make the euros a 32 team competition making qualifying almost pointless.

  9. #9
    rather mad Norwegian Magrat Garlick's Avatar
    Defend Your Castle Champion! Monkey Diving Champion!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    East Holland
    Posts
    26,397
    Quote Originally Posted by GIMH View Post
    So we can blame Furball, Uppercut and Nick-o?
    would you like to be blamed for what the FA suits at Wembley decide in their infinite wisdom?

  10. #10
    Spanish_Vicente sledger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Elm, he do brood. And Oak, he do hate. But the Willow-man goes walking, If you stays out late.
    Posts
    47,139
    Added time multi-ball.

  11. #11
    International Coach
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    england
    Posts
    10,273
    I don't dislike the current format. But I think what makes it good also makes it bad. You can lose your first two games and still qualify for the next round. I think that's good from the point of view of keeping most matches meaningful, but it also just seems wrong.

  12. #12
    Norwood's on Fire GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    League One
    Posts
    60,388
    Quote Originally Posted by Samuel_Vimes View Post
    would you like to be blamed for what the FA suits at Wembley decide in their infinite wisdom?
    I'm on record as hating Greg Dyke so I'm safe tbh

  13. #13
    Evil Scotsman
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    away from here
    Posts
    31,129
    Quote Originally Posted by GIMH View Post
    To be fair though, it's only one extra game per finalist. Surely shouldn't add a fatigue factor?
    Might be wrong on this one but the competition doesn't appear to be much longer than normal.

    It also ****s teams and players for the start of the season proper, not relevant at the moment because Scotland are pish but Rangers have gone back into pre-season after a 4 week break and our first competitive game is the 15th of July. Just when exactly are the top players meant to have a holiday?

  14. #14
    Norwood's on Fire GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    League One
    Posts
    60,388
    Quote Originally Posted by Furball View Post
    Might be wrong on this one but the competition doesn't appear to be much longer than normal.

    It also ****s teams and players for the start of the season proper, not relevant at the moment because Scotland are pish but Rangers have gone back into pre-season after a 4 week break and our first competitive game is the 15th of July. Just when exactly are the top players meant to have a holiday?
    Pretty sure the Euros was three weeks in the old format so it's an extra week long

    We play Liverpool before the tournament is even over. Looks like it will be a strong side

  15. #15
    Evil Scotsman
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    away from here
    Posts
    31,129
    Really doesn't sit right with me that Portugal, who failed to win a game, have advanced when Albania, who did win a game, have been eliminated.

    The bracket's just ended up weird as **** as well, all the major nations are in the same half. Spain or Italy's "easiest" match (on paper) is likely to be in the final.
    Magrat Garlick likes this.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 3 format players and a 3 format XI
    By honestbharani in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 05-05-2013, 05:23 AM
  2. WC 2011 Format!
    By laksh_01 in forum World Cup 2011
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 23-02-2011, 03:21 AM
  3. 40-over Format
    By Edged&Taken in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 12-06-2010, 11:02 PM
  4. Better Format?????
    By laksh_01 in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 21-10-2007, 04:39 PM
  5. My Out of the box 20/20 Format
    By Xuhaib in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 25-06-2007, 08:19 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •