Not surprised. Italy been the more likely to score.
Nice to see a team that doesn't fluff their brilliant chance against Spain at 0-0.
National Scrabble Champion 2009, 8th, 11th and 5th in 2009/2011/2013 World Championships, gold medal (team) at Causeway, 2011 Masters Champion
Australia’s Darren Lehmann is a ‘blatant loser’ insists Stuart Broad
Countdown Series 57 Champion
King of the Arcade
Reply from mods to my prank bans in public:
Reply from mods to my prank bans in private:
MSN - evil_budgie @ hotmail.co.uk
Ahh, evil winning, but at least they've played a striker, so I'm not that bothered for once.
Do I contradict myself?
Very well then I contradict myself,
(I am large, I contain multitudes.
Should have headed that. Don't seem to get many diving headers these days.
Spain look more lively since bringing a striker on, who would have thought it
Italy's defence looking surprisingly rubbish at times.
Probably a fair result that
Yerp, comfortably the best game so far as well imo.
England games are never for enjoying tbf.
Thought that was a fair result on the whole, fairly even game really.
Not a fan of the no striker tactic though. Think if you're going to do that you still need one of your players to have the primary role of "goalscorer", which Spain didn't seem to. Result was lots of nice passing and reasonable movement but Silva/Fabregas/Iniesta were just running all over the place with no main focal point of attack to play off. If Torres was actually still good these days he'd have wrapped it up for them, looked much more threatening once he came on.
Last edited by sledger; 10-06-2012 at 12:06 PM.
Wonder if by the end of the night you'll end up feeling monumentally pissed off tbh. Wouldn't rule it out.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)