Censorship

[marc71178]

Well from the closure of yet another thread, it appears that anything said against certain people will be censored.

Whatever happened to free speech?

 

[AUST_HiTMaN]

Sorry Marc, didn't quiet see you all the way down there.

Does every thread made need to be stickied or something?

The thread from Cbuts wasnt really needed to be sticked now was it?

 

[steds]

Well from the closure of yet another thread, it appears that anything said against certain people will be censored.

Whatever happened to free speech?

It wasn't free speach...it was an unprovoked attack on Nikhil

 

[superkingdave]

It wasn't free speach...it was an unprovoked attack on Nikhil

No entry found for speach.

 

[marc71178]

Unprovoked?

 

[Mr Mxyzptlk]

There are threads fpr discussion of this Marc - 2 of them. Do we really need more? Not sure about others, but I'm not fond of your Richardesque trend of griping about the same issue in every thread on the forum. Two threads is already more than enough.

 

[marc71178]

There's 2?

Although, actually the issue in here isn't to do with that, more to do with abuse of power.

 

[Mr Mxyzptlk]

Which you are yet to back with anything credible...

 

[marc71178]

Erm, don't the several closed threads say something?

 

[Mr Mxyzptlk]

Oh. My mistake. Thought you were referring to other issue at hand. The closed threads remain topped and available for all to read. Comments regarding the issue can be made here.

 

[steds]

Unprovoked?

yes, since he announced coming out of retirement(for the second time) he hasn't done anything to spite you(apart from reptying to the posts slating him, GOD FORBID!!!!) and has been pretty quiet. So, why start another "we hate Nikhil" thread? Don't you have enough anyway?

 

[marc71178]

Had the previous one not been touched, then it would've been a reply in there, and relevant.

 

[lord_of_darkness]

Although, actually the issue in here isn't to do with that, more to do with abuse of power.

It was closed for a fair reason.. As seen below..

Whatever happened to free speech?

Free speech is there in the CWXI to a greater level now.. but a lot of people have been abusing that matter and going beyond.. which is certainly not necessary as we are first a friendly forum.. So we have to maintain the integrity of the forum firstly... and also the fact that the CWXI was created for peoples enjoyment and we dont want to take that out of the picture by people abusing others directly and creating a unsettled atmosphere overall..

It is taking a direct attack at a member.. "everyone hates you here, it cant be much fun." & "y dont u just save ur face and get lost" and according to the Cricketweb rules "No Attacks / Retaliation of any kind against a member, or group of members." set by Big Chief James.. is against the forum rules.

Is that enough Marc?!

 

[marc71178]

Yes, so long as it is consistently applied (reminds me of one of the retirement threads)

 

[lord_of_darkness]

Please feel free to backup what you have said with the direct thread.. as there several now..

 

[marc71178]

I believe it was the second one.

 

[Loony BoB]

Unprovoked attack or provoked attack, I don't see the need for it. It's not solving anything. If someone has something to say to somebody, why not contact them directly rather than throwing it in everyone else's faces?

 

[ash chaulk]

i do spose this stuff should be in the players accosiation thread where we can yell more about the scandals