Should a CW Team be Folded? - Page 2

Johnners · 14-12-2007, 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chaminda_00

I don't like the idea of mergering teams. I reckon teams who have done the right thing and kept their players, should have the option of signing players from the expanded team. I much rather sign someone who has shown loyalty and stayed around then taking a gamble on rookies, who may or may not hang around.

Must say i don't like the attitude towards rookies there. You're hardly making people want to sign up by saying you would basically rather not sign them because you don't know if they're going to stay around.

Also, your 2nd sentence makes no sense to me whatsoever. What expanded team?

chaminda_00 · 14-12-2007, 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clapo

Must say i don't like the attitude towards rookies there. You're hardly making people want to sign up by saying you would basically rather not sign them because you don't know if they're going to stay around.

Also, your 2nd sentence makes no sense to me whatsoever. What expanded team?

Not saying there are not going to hang around at all. But realistically the guys from the folded are probably going to hang longer, as the all came back after a long break. If you want to build a side you better off IMO picking CW players you feel will hang around long term. By mergering two sides, your limiting the option of other sides to sign those type of players.

By expanded I meet folded.

Goughy · 14-12-2007, 12:28 AM

I am mainly if favour of merging 2 teams. I was worried about having to fold a team and merging 2 seems to be the best way.

However, my main concern is that we will have 6 good CW keepers for 5 CW teams and one will have to sit on the bench which is not really what we want.

chaminda_00 · 14-12-2007, 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goughy

I am mainly if favour of merging 2 teams. I was worried about having to fold a team and merging 2 seems to be the best way.

However, my main concern is that we will have 6 good CW keepers for 5 CW teams and one will have to sit on the bench which is not really what we want.

Andy hasn't signed in, so its only 5 ATM.

Goughy · 14-12-2007, 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chaminda_00

Andy hasn't signed in, so its only 5 ATM.

OK, this could work out ok then

Goughy · 14-12-2007, 05:22 AM

A merger has been decided upon. More news to follow.

View Poll Results: Should a CW Football Team be Folded?
Yes	13	86.67%
No	2	13.33%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll

14-12-2007, 12:28 AM	#18 (permalink)
Goughy International Coach Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: All Over Posts: 14,653	I am mainly if favour of merging 2 teams. I was worried about having to fold a team and merging 2 seems to be the best way. However, my main concern is that we will have 6 good CW keepers for 5 CW teams and one will have to sit on the bench which is not really what we want. __________________ If I only just posted the above post, please wait 5 mins before replying as there is bound to be edits West Robham Rabid Wolves Caedere lemma quod eat lemma Happy Birthday! (easier than using Birthday threads) Email and MSN- Goughy at cricketmail dot net

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
What happens if a player belonging to a team that does not qualify is in my team?	faizan_jamal	Fantasy Cricket	7	22-03-2007 09:14 AM
Which team was better? Windies of Early 80s or the current Aussie Team?	mkamdar	Cricket Chat	115	04-05-2004 10:47 AM
Why is Englands one day team so different to the test team?	Langeveldt	Cricket Chat	63	22-04-2004 05:45 AM
Do you think India is an entertaining team or a boring team?	masterblaster	Cricket Chat	22	27-07-2002 05:03 PM

14-12-2007, 05:22 AM	#21 (permalink)
Goughy International Coach Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: All Over Posts: 14,653	A merger has been decided upon. More news to follow.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)