Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 43

Thread: Australia announce bowling-heavy squad for India

  1. #1
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Mister Wright's Avatar
    Burger Time Champion!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    24,363

    Australia announce bowling-heavy squad for India

    Cricketweb Colts Captain



    Quote Originally Posted by Richard
    Hayden > Lehmann
    I'm a member of Club Kerry

    I'm Green

    The color of immortality, nature and envy - you are truly a unique person. While clearly the color of nature, you also symbolize rebirth, fertility and hope in the world. On the other side of the spectrum, a natural aptitude to money with green coming to signify money and possibly even *********!

  2. #2
    School Boy/Girl Cricketer Zeke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Tasmania, Australia
    Posts
    54
    WATTO!


  3. #3
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Mister Wright's Avatar
    Burger Time Champion!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    24,363
    I can't see there being much change to the batting line-up for the first test matcd, it should be; Hayden, Langer, Ponting, Martyn, Lehmann, Katich & Gilchrist. I think for the first test the bowling line-up will be; McGrath, Gillespie, Warne & Kasprowicz/Lee.

    This will give Australia three pace bowling options and Katich & Lehmann will provide back up to Warne.

    However, if Australia get beaten and it is due to the bowling, I can see Hauritz or White making their debuts in the second test. Can only see Watson as a replacement for Katich, if they decide to go with a second spinner and Katich is failing with the bat.

    MacGill, Symonds & Love can all feel a bit miffed at missing out IMO.

  4. #4
    World Traveller Craig's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Super Happy Fun Sugar Lollipop Land!
    Posts
    34,131
    As much as this is paining me to say it, Love's hopes of wearing the Baggy Green again are fading by the longer he keeps getting omitted from the Test squads on tour.

    The selection of three other specialist spinners really does interest me.
    Beware the lollipop of mediocrity. Lick once and you suck forever...

    RIP Fardin Qayyumi, a true legend of CW

    Quote Originally Posted by Boobidy View Post
    Bradman never had to face quicks like Sharma and Irfan Pathan. He wouldn't of lasted a ball against those 2, not to mention a spinner like Sehwag.


  5. #5
    School Boy/Girl Cricketer Zeke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Tasmania, Australia
    Posts
    54
    I'm baffled at Hauritz's selection. The kid had huge wraps and has done nothing.

  6. #6
    Cricketer Of The Year Blewy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Your house
    Posts
    9,964
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeke
    I'm baffled at Hauritz's selection. The kid had huge wraps and has done nothing.
    As had Gavin Robertson when he was selected to tour there, and his performances were very good....

    Hauritz has been chosen on his economy, his aim will be to tie down the indians with the ball turning back into the right handers...

  7. #7
    World Traveller Craig's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Super Happy Fun Sugar Lollipop Land!
    Posts
    34,131
    Come to think of it, it looks like Stuart MacGill has played his last Test for Australia.

  8. #8
    Cricketer Of The Year Blewy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Your house
    Posts
    9,964
    Quote Originally Posted by Craig
    Come to think of it, it looks like Stuart MacGill has played his last Test for Australia.

    For Sure...

    I never really thought he was a top bowler anyway... Yeah he took wickets but Sheesh talk about bad balls....

  9. #9
    Hall of Fame Member Sanz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    16,230

    Icon7

    I think it is a very good team and one of the toughest in recent times. Almost all the batsmen in this team are good at playing spin, Ricky Ponting is different player now and a much better player of spin than he was in 2000/1. I personally think he is a better captain than Steve Waugh.

    Bowling wise, Warnie is as good as ever and his recent successin SL boosted his confidence, Katich, Lehman and White provide good support to him. Fast bowling looks great with Lee, Kasper, Gillespie and Macgrath.

    IMO, It will be very difficult (almost impossible) for India to retain the Border-Gavaskar trophy because Harbhajan singh is not the same bowler he was in 2001, Kumble is old and will need a big score by our batsmen to do something and last but not the least, neutral umpiring is also important. Last series I felt that some Indian umpires were too quick in giving LBWs in Calcutta & Madras tests at crucial stages, that wont be the case with the neutral umpires this time. India would be lucky if they manage to Draw the series.

    I predict the series to be 3-1 or 2-1 in favor of Australia.

  10. #10
    Eyes not spreadsheets marc71178's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    57,722
    Watson and Clarke in, but no Symonds?

    That's strange...
    marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!

    Anyone want to join the Society?

    Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.

  11. #11
    Hall of Fame Member age_master's Avatar
    Plasmanaut on Fire Champion!
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Sydney, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    15,777
    they obviously now consider Symonds a spec for the ODI's and are no longer considering him for the tests.

    Watson and Clarke are both much younger than symonds.

    Watson is a much better bowler and batsman in the longer version of the game

    Clarke is a specialist batsman (even though he bowls quite well), i would not say in competition to Symonds for a spot - in the selectors minds - the Aust A game where he hammered an understrength Indian attack in hobart last year - the TVS cup.

    having played and spent alot of time recently with shane warne will probably have helped his understanding of spin bowling alot as well.

    i would say that the real surprise was Cam White picked ahead of symonds...
    Member of CW Green
    Kerry O'Keefe - Worlds funniest Commentator

  12. #12
    Cricketer Of The Year JASON's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    At Work
    Posts
    7,558
    "I don't need more awards ... I already have the world record."
    Muttiah Muralitharan takes his exclusion from the ICC's World XI on the chin


    Warne has 2 Tests to get 6 wickets (1st Test Bangalore - 6-10 October and 2nd Test Chennai 14-18 October) and take the world record before Murali (should he recover from his surgery in time) can come into action against Pakistan on 20th October. Hope Indian batsmen will be able to defy Warne and Tendulkar recovers from his injury as does Murali.

  13. #13
    You'll Never Walk Alone Nate's Avatar
    Bowling tgfg Champion! Carmageddon Champion! Rainman Champion! DTunnel Champion!
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    New South Wales
    Posts
    26,961
    Quote Originally Posted by JASON
    "I don't need more awards ... I already have the world record."
    Muttiah Muralitharan takes his exclusion from the ICC's World XI on the chin


    Warne has 2 Tests to get 6 wickets (1st Test Bangalore - 6-10 October and 2nd Test Chennai 14-18 October) and take the world record before Murali (should he recover from his surgery in time) can come into action against Pakistan on 20th October. Hope Indian batsmen will be able to defy Warne and Tendulkar recovers from his injury as does Murali.
    booooooooo... go warney.

    and whites selection was justified. if you can find a pitch that makes him look good, youll find it in india
    he should do alright IMO... even though i dont like the guy much, i know why they picked him.
    Jesus saves

    proudly supporting Liverpool FC

  14. #14
    International Debutant
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Canberra, ACT
    Posts
    2,585
    I agree with Sanz' comments re this squad.......

    just on another note I'd even go so far as to use this squad as an example of what I have been saying about 'horses for courses' selections for BOTH batting & bowling..............

    and 2ndly as an example of the smarts in the ACB to recognise that they may not be able to rely upon the same players to win in every circumstance & retain their position as #1.................

    they are already making changes to what they do to compensate for the likes of Warne, McGrath & Co - & they are still playing !!!!!!!

  15. #15
    Dar
    Dar is offline
    School Boy/Girl Captain Dar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    154
    I've never seen White so i can't comment on him but surely Macgill must be a bit disappointed. Normally the reason for his exclusion has been that they don't want two leggies but they picked White so its a bit hrash on Macgill.

    I think Katich has to do something on this tour to keep his place cos the Aussie top seven doesn't look AS deadly as it has previously (before you start its still good). I thought Brad Hodge should have been considered, he scores runs for fun in county cricket and bowls part time spin as well. But its not my problem as long as India win

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. lol ok this is old but funny.
    By Eclipse in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 09-02-2004, 11:40 PM
  2. Watson close to bowling comeback: Lillee
    By Eclipse in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 11-01-2004, 05:23 AM
  3. The Future Champions of Test Cricket
    By Shawn Badyk in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 10-07-2003, 03:11 AM
  4. Pre-Season Results
    By Blewy in forum World Club Cricket
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 14-04-2003, 09:42 PM
  5. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 14-03-2003, 07:37 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •