Its only you marc that wont accept that Lehman is an allrounder.marc71178 said:Note, this also applies to Darren Lehmann!
Its only you marc that wont accept that Lehman is an allrounder.marc71178 said:Note, this also applies to Darren Lehmann!
It looks closer to being only you who thinks that he is an allrounder... that or a reflection of the fact that Australia haven't had an allrounder worthy of the name since, ooh, before I can remember. Keith Miller?Scallywag said:Its only you marc that wont accept that Lehman is an allrounder.
Neil Pickup said:It looks closer to being only you who thinks that he is an allrounder... that or a reflection of the fact that Australia haven't had an allrounder worthy of the name since, ooh, before I can remember. Keith Miller?
And England haven't had a cricketer worthy of the name since.........
Oh no it's not - if he were an all rounder he'd be bowling at least 7 overs per ODI and 10-15 per Test innings.Scallywag said:Its only you marc that wont accept that Lehman is an allrounder.
common mate, Lehman isn't an allrounder. Can he get into the Australian side on his bowling alone ??Scallywag said:Its only you marc that wont accept that Lehman is an allrounder.
The subject of this thread looks pretty good to me.Son Of Coco said:And England haven't had a cricketer worthy of the name since.........
haha, I knew that would get a bite. Present players excluded of course, and anyone who's currently in form (Disclaimer: I consider someone who's currently in form to be anyone who's even managed to pass themselves off as a cricketer for one match in the last 6 years).marc71178 said:The subject of this thread looks pretty good to me.
Scallywag said:Gooch gave away 42 runs per wicket which is where most part time bowlers hover, do you know why Lehmann only gives away 25 runs per wicket.