• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* England in New Zealand 2019

nzfan

International Vice-Captain
Rachin gone for a breezy 12 off 13. Hope he gets a second dig.
Bugger... he's gone. Looked in the pooch and he had so much time to play both Archer and Broad. Of the number of balls he faced he's straight driven, glanced, back foot punched and flicked... geez. Very aggressive bat by the looks of it. Shame he didn't block the one he got out.
 

TheBrand

First Class Debutant
Ludicrous squad picking both Santner and Astle. Can't believe it. I might write an open letter to Gavin Larsen.
 

vandem

International 12th Man
Important day for Phillips and Seifert.

Plausible sequence:

- a good innings today
- Kane injury in 1st test
- test debut at Hamilton
- another good innings
- jump ahead of Young in the "when Ross retires" race
 

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
Picking Astle as backup for Santner at home is strange - he needs lots of bowling, hasn't had it and his control looked poor in the warmups in SL.

Picking Astle over both Somerville and Ajaz to tour Australia is absolutely bizarre. Visiting spinners struggle at the best of times in Australia, so to choose a legspinner who sometimes struggles to land it is asking for a world of pain.

Still would've picked Somerville over Santner for Australia too. Santner might have scraped into squad as second spinner, or not.
 

nzfan

International Vice-Captain
Now our own Steve Smith is smashing it vs England. I like this new bunch, they just go after it, they don't get intimidated by big name players. That's the NZ Players I know of and that is the reason we punch well above our weight.
 
Last edited:

vandem

International 12th Man
Picking Astle as backup for Santner at home is strange - he needs lots of bowling, hasn't had it and his control looked poor in the warmups in SL.

Picking Astle over both Somerville and Ajaz to tour Australia is absolutely bizarre. Visiting spinners struggle at the best of times in Australia, so to choose a legspinner who sometimes struggles to land it is asking for a world of pain.

Still would've picked Somerville over Santner for Australia too. Santner might have scraped into squad as second spinner, or not.
I think the selection strategy was (1) we need a containing spinner, because we back ourselves to get most 2nd innings wickets from new ball + Wagner short stuff, (2) if we don't need the spinner to take wickets, they need to be able to bat at #8, (3) Santner is the best fit, (4) and if Santner in injured, Astle is the like-for-like.

(1) (2) (3) I am OK with, (4) I think Sommerville is a better fit, have been impressed by his tenacious batting in his short test career.
 

NZTailender

I can't believe I ate the whole thing
Somerville and Patel are playing this match. Would be hilarious if they bagged 5 each or something.

edit: and scored 50s
 

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
I think the selection strategy was (1) we need a containing spinner, because we back ourselves to get most 2nd innings wickets from new ball + Wagner short stuff, (2) if we don't need the spinner to take wickets, they need to be able to bat at #8, (3) Santner is the best fit, (4) and if Santner in injured, Astle is the like-for-like.

(1) (2) (3) I am OK with, (4) I think Sommerville is a better fit, have been impressed by his tenacious batting in his short test career.
I agree this is the thinking - we've used the Santner + CDG combination to cover bases at home quite well for the last few seasons. I think the approach is ok for the two home England tests (with Somerville replacing Astle), but I don't agree with it for Australia.
 

Howsie

International Captain
I hope Phillips goes big here, how he isn’t making any of these New Zealand squads I have no idea.
 

thierry henry

International Coach
I feel like poor old Tastle is getting a bit of a rough go here.

If you go back a couple of years he and Santner were, with some justification, #1 and #2 on the pecking order. Purely due to injuries, Patel and Somerville got a go in favourable subcontinent conditions and did well.

I'm not trying to understate the importance of Patel and Somerville actually proving themselves on the international stage, but (maybe being Devil's Advocate to an extent) I also don't really see what Astle has done wrong to definitively fall behind them, especially when we are talking about totally different conditions where all of them are completely unproven at international level?

Of course, all of this ignores a more nuanced technical assessment of current form. Maybe Astle will turn out to be completely out of form, short of a gallop, or just ineffective in Australia conditions. I'm just saying, he never reaaaaaaally did anything wrong to lose his place.

Re: Santner, I still have some hopes for him, but as he doesn't have the body of work behind him as a frontline spinner I am more readily able to understand the criticism. I tend to think NZC still have plans for him for the future, although that was undermined somewhat by how quickly he was dropped in Sri Lanka.

Hey, remember when Santner was an automatic pick and Ish Sodhi was our clear #2?
 

The Hutt Rec

International Vice-Captain
I feel like poor old Tastle is getting a bit of a rough go here.

If you go back a couple of years he and Santner were, with some justification, #1 and #2 on the pecking order. Purely due to injuries, Patel and Somerville got a go in favourable subcontinent conditions and did well.

I'm not trying to understate the importance of Patel and Somerville actually proving themselves on the international stage, but (maybe being Devil's Advocate to an extent) I also don't really see what Astle has done wrong to definitively fall behind them, especially when we are talking about totally different conditions where all of them are completely unproven at international level?

Of course, all of this ignores a more nuanced technical assessment of current form. Maybe Astle will turn out to be completely out of form, short of a gallop, or just ineffective in Australia conditions. I'm just saying, he never reaaaaaaally did anything wrong to lose his place.

Re: Santner, I still have some hopes for him, but as he doesn't have the body of work behind him as a frontline spinner I am more readily able to understand the criticism. I tend to think NZC still have plans for him for the future, although that was undermined somewhat by how quickly he was dropped in Sri Lanka.

Hey, remember when Santner was an automatic pick and Ish Sodhi was our clear #2?
Astle has also done nothing to win his spot, which Somerville and Ajaz have.

I think it’s just down to using some common sense as a selector, rather than defaulting back to “this guy is the incumbent because he got the nod three years ago”.
 

thierry henry

International Coach
Astle has also done nothing to win his spot, which Somerville and Ajaz have.

I think it’s just down to using some common sense as a selector, rather than defaulting back to “this guy is the incumbent because he got the nod three years ago”.
Didn't Astle win/hasn't Astle won his spot due to years and years of good domestic performances?

Is it "common sense" that your best option 12 months ago (not 3 years...but for injury he was playing in Pakistan) is no longer your best option when you have no direct basis for comparison between him and his competitors?

Look, I totally get why you want the guys who have picked up crucial poles in the subcontinent, but I just don't think it's that black and white.
 

The Hutt Rec

International Vice-Captain
Didn't Astle win/hasn't Astle won his spot due to years and years of good domestic performances?

Is it "common sense" that your best option 12 months ago (not 3 years...but for injury he was playing in Pakistan) is no longer your best option when you have no direct basis for comparison between him and his competitors?

Look, I totally get why you want the guys who have picked up crucial poles in the subcontinent, but I just don't think it's that black and white.
When the reason Larsen gives for selection is bolstering batting (when Somerville has outperformed Astle by far in batting at test match level) and experience in conditions (again, huge advantage to Somerville in that department), then yes, I think common sense is lacking. Add to that the reluctance of the touring party to give Astle a go in Sri Lanka, which must say a bit, and I just don’t get it. To me he doesn’t get the spot on incumbency, or horses for courses.
 

thierry henry

International Coach
tbf Somerville's FC experience in Australia is very minimal. I feel like that gets exaggerated a bit. Like I get that he played plenty of cricket there but I'm not entirely sold on promoting a guy above our theoretical #1 because of grade cricket.
 

jcas0167

International Debutant
Feel for England coming to NZ and again having to bowl to someone doing a reasonable imitation of Steve Smith.
 

Top