That's kinda like hitters average with the bases loaded in baseball.I would like to see free hit strike rates if they were available.
Yeh. Deciding a six week tournament based off a completely unrelated process, a process so so unrelated to the actual six week comp that the stats for it aren't even officially recorded, is a "jump in logic".So because they don't count towards career stats, the system is flawed?
That's a jump in logic if ever I saw one.
In footy two World Cup finals have been decided on penalties, goals in them don’t count to stats either. I’m sure other sports would have similar comparisons.Yeh. Deciding a six week tournament based off a completely unrelated process, a process so so unrelated to the actual six week comp that the stats for it aren't even officially recorded, is a "jump in logic".
Nah, its very different IMO.That's kinda like hitters average with the bases loaded in baseball.
Bro I'm sure most agree that Super Over to decide a World Cup isn't ideal, but using "the stats aren't recorded" as the reason why is strangeYeh. Deciding a six week tournament based off a completely unrelated process, a process so so unrelated to the actual six week comp that the stats for it aren't even officially recorded, is a "jump in logic".
No it's not. The reason the stats aren't recorded is because the system has no relation to the actual contest.Bro I'm sure most agree that Super Over to decide a World Cup isn't ideal, but using "the stats aren't recorded" as the reason why is strange
How on earth could anyone think that a system, to decide the winner of a six week premier tournament, that has nothing in common with the tournament, is perfect?I actually think the super over is perfect, sure a super powerplay of 5 overs perhaps more suitable for an ODI WC final, but whatever. The only issue (and it's a major issue) is giving up on finding an outright winner after only one is tied