How would the greatest bowlers Malcom Marshall and SF Barnes do agaisnt the greatest batsman Don Bradman and who could have stopped Bradman.
How would the greatest bowlers Malcom Marshall and SF Barnes do agaisnt the greatest batsman Don Bradman and who could have stopped Bradman.
Harmo.Originally Posted by THE DON
MSN Messenger: minardineil2000 at hotmail dot com | AAAS Chairman
CricketWeb Black | CricketWeb XI Captain
ClarkeWatch: We're Watching Rikki - Are You?
Up The Grecians - Exeter City FC
Completing the Square: My Cricket Web Blog
A good spinner on a slow, turning subcontinental pitch might have tested him. He probably would not have come across such conditions often in his career.
Definitely not. Bradman was never seriously troubled by any fast bowler, even on the bodyline tour he averaged over 50.Originally Posted by Neil Pickup
If he was to struggle against anyone it would be a spinner - Hedley Verity got him out 11 times in Tests, more than anyone else.
THE ULTIMATE CRICKET WEB ARCADE EGGS CHAMPION
RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1990-2006
RIP Craig Walsh (AKA "Craig"), 1985-2012
Is there really a need to take everything so seriously?!Originally Posted by a massive zebra
How was I to know you were joking? You seem to rate Harmison very highly.Originally Posted by Neil Pickup
![]()
HarmoOriginally Posted by a massive zebra
EDIT: No, I don't know why I typed that either. I'll go and have a lie down.
Nigel Clough's Black and White Army, beating Forest away with 10 men
Neil ≠ Marc.Originally Posted by a massive zebra
Harmo sucks! (Don't need to take it seriouslyOriginally Posted by a massive zebra
)
You talking to IR?
OK, someone's gonna get banned...Originally Posted by chicane
[Thought Control, copyright ICC, 2004]
Sure the likes of Verity etc. got Bradman out more often than others, but in all reallity, there would be really no one who could stop the greatest batsman ever.
Sure, possibly some of the great fast bowlers may have been able to get Bradman out, but IMO it would of been all too late as he would of probably scored a century at least by the time he would of been dismissed.
My 2003 Australian Cricketers Rankings No.1's
Test Batting: Mathew Hayden
Test Bowling: Stuart MacGill
ODI Batting: Ricky Ponting
ODI Bowling: Brett Lee
Ford Rules!
To get someone like Bradman out would require extreme consistency and the ability to manipulate the ball as you wish. Bradman was a test batsmen personified and therefore you would have to be as patient with bowling as he was persistent with his batting. Eventually everyone cracks.
R.I.P Fardin Qayyumi (Cricket Player)
'Last one on drugs is a queer,' yells portillo..
Hope is a good thing, maybe even the best of things. And no good thing ever dies......
Self appointed president of the KPPAS
i do believe that the likes of murali and warne would have tested him particularly on turning wickets aka SL.Originally Posted by THE DON
Tendulkar = the most overated player EVER!!
Beckham = the most overated footballer EVER!!
Vassell = the biggest disgrace since rikki clarke!!
I seriously doubt Warne would have troubled him considering Tendulkar utterly humiliated Warne most times they faced eachother. Bradman himself admitted that Tendulkar played in a similar manner to the Don, but the Australian had a hugely superior record which suggests he may have been an upgraded Tendulkar.Originally Posted by tooextracool
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)