Harmo.THE DON said:Who could have stopped Bradman?
Definitely not. Bradman was never seriously troubled by any fast bowler, even on the bodyline tour he averaged over 50.Neil Pickup said:Harmo.
Is there really a need to take everything so seriously?!a massive zebra said:Definitely not. Bradman was never seriously troubled by any fast bowler, even on the bodyline tour he averaged over 50.
If he was to struggle against anyone it would be a spinner - Hedley Verity got him out 11 times in Tests, more than anyone else.
How was I to know you were joking? You seem to rate Harmison very highly.Neil Pickup said:Is there really a need to take everything so seriously?!
Harmoa massive zebra said:How was I to know you were joking? You seem to rate Harmison very highly.
Neil ≠ Marc.a massive zebra said:How was I to know you were joking? You seem to rate Harmison very highly.
Harmo sucks! (Don't need to take it seriously )a massive zebra said:How was I to know you were joking? You seem to rate Harmison very highly.
OK, someone's gonna get banned...chicane said:Harmo sucks! (Don't need to take it seriously )
i do believe that the likes of murali and warne would have tested him particularly on turning wickets aka SL.THE DON said:How would the greatest bowlers Malcom Marshall and SF Barnes do agaisnt the greatest batsman Don Bradman and who could have stopped Bradman.
I seriously doubt Warne would have troubled him considering Tendulkar utterly humiliated Warne most times they faced eachother. Bradman himself admitted that Tendulkar played in a similar manner to the Don, but the Australian had a hugely superior record which suggests he may have been an upgraded Tendulkar.tooextracool said:i do believe that the likes of murali and warne would have tested him particularly on turning wickets aka SL.
Which totally misses the fact that Tendulkar has so much more experience of playing spinners on Sub-Continental wickets than Bradman.a massive zebra said:I seriously doubt Warne would have troubled him considering Tendulkar utterly humiliated Warne most times they faced eachother. Bradman himself admitted that Tendulkar played in a similar manner to the Don, but the Australian had a hugely superior record which suggests he may have been an upgraded Tendulkar.
Warne posed no problems for Tendulkar in Australia either. They have not just played against eachother in the subcontinent.Neil Pickup said:Which totally misses the fact that Tendulkar has so much more experience of playing spinners on Sub-Continental wickets than Bradman.
You'll no doubt be able to explain that, given that Bradman played in the era of the flattest tracks ever known, under an lbw Law which favoured the batsman outrageously, with fielding standards abysmal by today's standard, and in front of smaller stumps.chicane said:The great one would be even better on today's flat tracks, fast outfields and rules.