Quote Originally Posted by Pap Finn Keighl View Post
Rohit Sharma 14 / 51 - significantly lower ratio than 18 / 60 ?
Yes, ore than 10% lower.

Quote Originally Posted by Pap Finn Keighl View Post
Warner 10/41 is much closer than the difference between Lara / ponting and Sachin.
Relevance to the fact it's a lot lower ratio then Kohli's?

Quote Originally Posted by Pap Finn Keighl View Post
I liked the 2nd point.
It's like going ga ga over size of an elephant when comparing it to a T-Rex
It really isn't - it's showing that your point about 18 tons in 60 innings not being the best ever to be complete and utter tripe seeing as that run of games is more than most other batsmen have scored in whole careers (the minimum length of which is 171 innings).