Well within his rights yeah.I’m sure he would push him because he’s a ****. Then Pollard would belt him and it would be on.
However as I understand it Pollsrd would be well within his rights to stand perfectly still and wouldn’t be out obstructing the field if he did so.
Why does law 37.4 still exist. You still have to get consent to throw the ball back to the fielder/bowler even if there's no threat on your wicket? This #metoo movement is out of control.If he stood perfectly still and blocked a catch as a result he would be obstructing the field. It's common sense. The ball is in the air, everyone can see it, and you can see a fielder trying to get under it. No reason to stand your ground outside of wanting to block the catch. It's intentional, and it's cut and dry.
You all need to read the law:
https://www.lords.org/mcc/laws-of-cricket/laws/law-37-obstructing-the-field/
Clarity.... otherwise what constitutes if it will/will not threaten the wickets? Clear line in sand, don't touch the ****ing ball without permission.Why does law 37.4 still exist. You still have to get consent to throw the ball back to the fielder/bowler even if there's no threat on your wicket? This #metoo movement is out of control.
basically thisClarity.... otherwise what constitutes if it will/will not threaten the wickets? Clear line in sand, don't touch the ****ing ball without permission.