dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
Is that a serious thread or a ****posting one? The replies confuse me.
Is that a serious thread or a ****posting one? The replies confuse me.
It's the serious replies that confused me. Like, how could anyone take a dire post like this seriously:A ****posting thread where some people overlooked the fact that sledger started it and gave serious replies.
Yeah, I guess it could be a cultural/societal thing. Some cultures and societies are inherently corrupt, or at least are underpinned by elements of dishonesty. I suppose it's conceivable that some subcontinent countries could fall into this bracket, but I had never really thought about it until now. I suppose it would explain a few things.
They don't know sledger?It's the serious replies that confused me. Like, how could anyone take a dire post like this seriously:
It's cute to see sledger play like this in CC again. Must be a slow Sunday.Tbh ***** bring confused by simple ideas/material is hardly uncommon. Burge's posting on the matter on the money as usual though.
What he really wants to do is debate NDAs with us, but methinks we'd best not go thereIt's cute to see sledger play like this in CC again. Must be a slow Sunday.
Only just saw this reply.I hardly think that's likely to be the answer. Thanks anyway though.
Too many chickpeas becomes an issue, I agree.Lack of beef in the diet I suspect
Doing his best impression of a poster people care about as usual.***** stinking the thread out again I see
If you add up the population of all the cricket playing nations, the total population of these asian countries alone would account for more than 80%....that the majority of people who have been banned from playing international cricket by the ICC (for corruption) are from the subcontinent?
Serious question.
When you add it all up, a total of 14 players from the subcontinent have been banned by the ICC for being corrupt (5 from India, 7 from Pakistan, 2 from Bangladesh, and 1 from Sri Lanka).
That is more than the combined total of all other nations put together (which is 11).
In other words more than 50% of all corruption related bans have gone to the subcontinent, and the majority of these have gone to two nations specifically. This seems disproportionately high.
Is there some reason which explains why people from these countries appear to be partciularly susceptible to being corrupt?
I probably would if the team I supported hadn't won a game against opposition better than Zimbabwe in the last 10 months.If you are minded to start a new thread then please do so, and I will consider whether I reply to it later.
All teams only field 11 players at a time, population numbers are irrelevant.If you add up the population of all the cricket playing nations, the total population of these asian countries alone would account for more than 80%.
From that angle, the non asian countries producing 40% of corrupt cricketers proves that the Asian countries are more honest than the rest of the world.