Starfighter
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Easier said than done.
I'd wager that a rather small percentage of run-outs are caused by this.If you constantly risk the quick single, eventually one fielder is going to nail the quick pick up and throw and catch you short.
this thinking leads toQuick singles in test matches are dumb
because you also have a heavy share of batsmen who believe you take every run possibleTo my eye a large majority of run outs, in Tests are least, seem to occur when the batsmen disagree over whether there's a run there.
Not sure if srsQuick singles in test matches are dumb
This is where you're making assumptions, and probably wrong. If you cut out all "risky running" you'd probably leave a lot more runs out there than run outs would cost you. Hence why you do it.Risk Management. In all sports. As in life. Should I go for it ? or Not ? Should I race thru the red light and gain a few seconds ? And run the risk of a crash ?. Or stop.
My point is there are warranted Run-Outs and there are unwarranted Run-Outs.
I have no qualms with the former.
But the latter is a matter of indecisiveness and desperation.
You're losing the psychological battle when you scrounge for scraps - a measly run here or there.
And when you do get Run-Out, it depresses you/team morale and uplifts your opponents.
You've gotten yourself or your partner out, not necessarily due to your opponents bowling skill, but due to your own fault.
A good batsman could attain more runs by staying at the crease (~ 20+ runs - more in partnership), whereas risky running would gain them much less ( ~ 10- runs)
I think you've missed the point and taken off into a tangentExactly. The concept of unwarranted run is so subjective that it has no meaning or definition that can be applied when making decisions. Also if you are a player who likes to rotate the strike and build confidence early in your innings the last thing you need at the other end is a run snob saying quick singles are dumb. That sort of a partner is basically saying they don't care about you or the team. What's the bet they'd be keen for their own singles when on strike, especially facing a challenging over.
I'm responding to other people's comments as well as your meaningless concept of "unwarranted runs". You're not the only person on forum you know.I think you've missed the point and taken off into a tangent
Well that's why run-outs and having the ball crash on your stumps is so hilarious. They're not exactly success stories.Why do batsmen sometimes leave the ball on the stumps? I don't get it. If the ball is close to the stumps why don't they just play at it so they don't get bowled?
same thing. People aren't robots who judge everything perfectly, instantly. Run outs happen.
Pujara made a bad judgement call and Kohli could have stopped him.How do you judge 'not warranted'? Pujara is bad running between the wickets, we know that. Is he just supposed to run on the easiest of singles? It's pretty hard to get around the fact that the more runs you run the more runs you'll score. And so many times the run could be made if someone hadn't screwed up. Are partners supposed to anticipate each other's screw ups?
Don't understand what you mean. Are you responding to me or not ?I'm responding to other people's comments as well as your meaningless concept of "unwarranted runs". You're not the only person on forum you know.
No I'm responding to others. That's why I quoted your post.Don't understand what you mean. Are you responding to me or not ?