What I meant to say he hasn't done anything otherwordly to merit a comparison with established ATGs. Needs to have a full career pan out well before he's compared to Sachin.Who are these JAMODI characters who apparently are obsessed with these ungodly peaks?
If he's being compared with Tendulkar now, hasn't he already surpassed Bradman?It began a long time ago.
Kohli only needs to score 3 more centuries before comparisons with Bradman begin.
There's WG Grace, too. Probably should have been deported as well.The best players are often pricks. Warne, Ponting (young), Steve Smith. Even Bradman had a bit of a reputation.
Hmm maybe it's just Australians.
Struggling to see whether you think he’s a better player when you combine all 3 formats (which would be wrong because Tendulkar was a far superior Test bat and a better ODI batsman which Kohli’s dominance over him in T20s wouldn’t cover for) or if you think he’s a better player in all 3 formats (which again would be wrong).Across all formats Kohli is a superior player for me
You can also add fielding in and Kohli is a better fielder too. I don't want either of them bowling overs that's for sure.
Sachin was in my ATG team of the last 25 years. He was obviously a great player.Sachin was truly sensational. I don't care if it's cliched to say so. No one else has averaged over 40 everywhere and I think that's one of the stats which define him. Virat has a long, long way to go before he even deserves to be compared. Plus he's a prick.
Kohli has huge dominance over him in both limited overs formats. Their test record is similar.Struggling to see whether you think he’s a better player when you combine all 3 formats (which would be wrong because Tendulkar was a far superior Test bat and a better ODI batsman which Kohli’s dominance over him in T20s wouldn’t cover for) or if you think he’s a better player in all 3 formats (which again would be wrong).
Mate only average matters, literally no other stat is to be considered.'Their Test record is similar'
...not sure if srs