ok i think we've had enough of that for a while....if you're not satisfied then i suggest you check this out http://forum.cricketweb.net/showthread.php?t=7505pakster said:"Sachin's had lots of man of the match awards when India has lost..."
hmm, very interesting. If true, does that mean that sachin is not a match winner? and therefore not a great player? Surely to b great u must b a match winner!!
Come to think of it, in the last series against the mighty paks...sachin never played a match winning inngs. His century in the ODI was in a losing cause and his century in the first ODI wasnt really match winning, rather it was sehwag who won the match with his 309!!
He's also won a lot more MOM awards when India have won.pakster said:hmm, very interesting. If true, does that mean that sachin is not a match winner? and therefore not a great player? Surely to b great u must b a match winner!!
masterblaster said:Sachin's had lots of man of the match awards when India has lost...
Lets not go there againmarc71178 said:But that's obviously because he's a choker!
He performs well under pressuremarc71178 said:But that's obviously because he's a choker!
I'm sure he is. A cheat and a choker. Should've been dropped years ago, or perhaps banned for cheating?Scallywag said:Tendulkar is a convicted ball tamperer, in other words a cheat.
He's also a bloody Motherchoker.Scallywag ( who else ? ).....Tendulkar is a convicted ball tamperer, in other words a cheat.
Scallywag said:You have to wonder dont you, Indian bowlers come good after Tendulkar and Dravid are caught red handed cheating by altering the condition of the ball.
orangepitch said:He's also a bloody Motherchoker.
I guess soDasa said:I'm sure he is. A cheat and a choker. Should've been dropped years ago, or perhaps banned for cheating?
Dasa said:I'm sure he is. A cheat and a choker. Should've been dropped years ago, or perhaps banned for cheating?
Guess what? Ur smileys don't show what response u agree to?Craig said:I guess so