Probably because of the power their batting line up possesses. Under pressure they may crumble, but they're still difficult to beat in ODI series.Why is everyone acting like this England team is Australia circa 2007. They're good but they're definitely beatable.
Their batting is genuinely pretty awesome. Their bowling is mid-tier at best though really so when they're not posting big scores (like today), they could really be under pressure to defend them.Why is everyone acting like this England team is Australia circa 2007. They're good but they're definitely beatable.
Yep, especially chasing this sort of target against meh bowling. Munro is the fourth most important batsman here at best.This isn't T20 cricket, NZ are far from reliant on Munro and Guptill to win - Williamson and Taylor are all-time-XI ODI players for NZ.
NZ doesn’t have a weak ODI lineup?285 is a decent score and if England didn't have trash bowling I'd typically say you could defend that total. New Zealand should be able to chase this, but then again NZ has a weak odi lineup. (And a horrid middle order)
I think it's actually been quite a while since they posted a 286 or above in an odi.