• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

All time world ODI XI game

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Viv
Murali
Pollock

Don't think Garner's bowling is better enough to compensate for Pollock's useful batting down the order. The tail'd be way too long with McGrath, Murali and Garner all one after the other.
 
Last edited:

steve132

U19 Debutant
Richards
Murali
Garner

Although I went with Murali as my spinner I'm surprised that to date no one has mentioned Derek Underwood. He would be a close No.2 for me.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
All this Murali love is going to leave this team with a longer tail than the A team. Garner should be a lock in this side and a tail with Garner-McGrath-Murali is too damned long. Warne is just as good as Murali with the ball and is a much better bat.
 

randycricfreak

State Vice-Captain
All this Murali love is going to leave this team with a longer tail than the A team. Garner should be a lock in this side and a tail with Garner-McGrath-Murali is too damned long. Warne is just as good as Murali with the ball and is a much better bat.
Disagree.
Even a long tail is fine as long as you can keep the opposition teams down and out with quick/early wickets.

Akram was handy with the bat at 8 anyway.Warne is not going to make a substantial difference with the bat anyway.

Muralitharan though without a reputation as a batsman whatsoever, managed to sneak in some wins for SL.

2010 win Vs Aus.Massive partnership for the 9th wicket between Mathews and Malinga, it was Murali who provided the finishing touches.

A Tri series final Vs Bangladesh, Murali scored 33 runs and remained not out.

Just saying he can hold the bat, if need be.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Disagree.
Even a long tail is fine as long as you can keep the opposition teams down and out with quick/early wickets.

Akram was handy with the bat at 8 anyway.Warne is not going to make a substantial difference with the bat anyway.

Muralitharan though without a reputation as a batsman whatsoever, managed to sneak in some wins for SL.

2010 win Vs Aus.Massive partnership for the 9th wicket between Mathews and Malinga, it was Murali who provided the finishing touches.

A Tri series final Vs Bangladesh, Murali scored 33 runs and remained not out.

Just saying he can hold the bat, if need be.
We're talking about selecting the best world XI in history. They should be able to bat down to at least 9. Garner and McGrath are both genuinely poor batsmen. A tail of Garner, McGrath, Murali is really bad. It's not like tests where you need to take 20 wickets. Your bowlers are only getting 10 overs each. Picking a fractionally worse bowler is a lot better if they offer a lot more worth the bat.

The way this is going it's possible the A team will have a better balanced side. Hadlee, Warne, Waqar and Ambrose is a much healthier looking tail and doesn't sacrifice a lot with the ball.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Very predictable that Stephen would have a cry about an Aussie not being voted up.
Turn it up. I'm arguing entirely about balance here.

If the openers had been voted for first and Jaya/Tendulkar had have been picked I'd be arguing for Dhoni as keeper if everyone had been picking Gilly.

ODI teams are very finely balanced and need to bat down to 9. If Wasim was Pollock quality with the bat then maybe you could get away with having 3 number 11s but he really isn't.

We saw yesterday that a team that bats deep can apply pressure even if they are 5/8 in the early overs.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Viv
Murali
Pollock

Don't think Garner's bowling is better enough to compensate for Pollock's useful batting down the order. The tail'd be way too long with McGrath, Murali and Garner all one after the other.
The other fat bowling option that springs to mind is Hadlee. Better with the ball than Pollock but not quite as good with the bat.
 

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
You seriously can't be arguing for Warne for batting depth. Averaged 13 and scored exactly 1 fifty. Pollock (14 fifties, 1 hundred) over McGrath would be a better argument. Try that.
 

Red

The normal awards that everyone else has
Number 3 - Richards (11 votes) ahead of Kohli (5) and Ponting (2)

Spinner - Murali (13) ahead of Warne (2) and Afridi (1), Saqlain (1).

3rd seamer - Garner (11) ahead of Pollock (2) and Lee (1), Waqar (1), Starc (1) and Hadlee (1).


Pretty clear winners in the end.
 

Red

The normal awards that everyone else has
World ODI First XI

Adam Gilchrist +
-
Viv Richards
-
-
-
-
Wasim Akram
Joel Garner
Muttiah Muralitharan
Glenn McGrath
 

Top