Firebreaker
Banned
In my opinion it is Travis Head.He just jogs in and bowls without any hint of spin or turn and usually goes plenty.
Ishant Sharma is nothing special and will probably go down as the worst bowler ever to take 200 Test wickets, but anyone who can average under 40 with the ball in both Tests and ODIs for many years of international cricket is obviously far from the least effective bowler in cricket.Ishant Sharma - bowls a great spell once in 15 tests.
If it provides an excuse to keep Maxwell out of the side, they'll keep doing it.I wish they would stop giving Travis Head a bowl so much. They've fed his ego so much that he's actually starting to think he's an all rounder
FMD, would hate to see what an effective bowler could do to you.....Stuart Broad
True dat.....but still the most one eyed poster on the forum. Wanker.The least effective bowler is the one bowling to Smith at any given time.
SR of 121. Wow. And he took 100+ wickets!Carl Hooper's offspin looked like a pisstake