badgerhair said:He may not be very good, but he does OK.
Are you suggesting he's "very good", then?marc71178 said:It depends on what you call good.Originally Posted by badgerhair
He may not be very good, but he does OK.
Ah, semantics.marc71178 said:No, I just don't think he's "not very good"
As have a lot of finger spinners...Tim said:You might well be right...if there's one team Vettori has enjoyed bowling to over the years, its strangely Australia.
This one's shaping up to be the most pedantic argument ever...luckyeddie said:Ah, semantics.
Not 'very good' or 'not very good'?
The misplaced quote changes everything.
Positively flammable.Neil Pickup said:This one's shaping up to be the most pedantic argument ever...
Not this again!luckyeddie said:You causing trouble.... PAL?
Going to become a cliche, I can tell.Langeveldt said:Not this again!
Thanks Beth, I think just because he hasn't taken many wickets doesn't make him a bad player!Beth said:I think Daniel Vettori has been given a hard time and sure his recent results haven't been very impressive but surely as a young and talented player who has shown potential in the past, shouldn't he be given a fair go? Everyone has their off times. This guy has got what it takes. I am backing Vettori as I know he has what it takes.
Billy didn't do anything to his action. At first, Vettori took offence at his comments, but later on just took it as advice.Vettori is certainly not over-rated . In fact he is one of the best spinners NZ ever had. I read somewhere, that he was advised to change his action by an ex-pakistani cricketer called "Billy Ibadulla" . Whatever Bill did, Vettori is not the same bowler ever since . I wonder if he should just revert to what he was bowling before the change in his action
And far, far, far, far better than Gareth Batty.chris.hinton said:You will find that Vettori is a Far better bowler then Ashley Giles
How?chris.hinton said:You will find that Vettori is a Far better bowler then Ashley Giles
Isn't Derbyshire right next to Warwickshire and Worcestershire?luckyeddie said:And far, far, far, far better than Gareth Batty.
(who sucks)
That's what it's about isn't it? Midlands rivalry?
No.Craig said:Isn't Derbyshire right next to Warwickshire and Worcestershire?
badgerhair said:How?
I can't think there'd be many who'd deny that Vettori *was* a far better bowler than Giles 3-4 years ago.
What evidence is there for that still being the case today?
Just as Ian Botham was the best bowler in the world in 1979 (of those still playing official Test cricket at the time, that is), but was nothing like the same bowler 3-4 years later after he'd had to change his action following his back trouble.
(Which is why all this talk of how things will be so much better when Vettori rediscovers how to bowl well is so misguided. It's unlikely that Vettori will get significantly better than he is right now, so the question is how best to use his more limited abilities.)
Cheers,
Mike
Thats not a bad idea. His batting particularly makes it so.anzac said:ok so if this is so, that because of his grip he's not going to get any better, then IMO he should become an ODI 'specialist' - his average is about the same as Giles with the ball, and we know his batting has improved since the tour to IND.............