• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

International Cricket Captain ODI World Cup (sim league mach 2)

kingkallis

International Coach
A guy making the debut in a decade doesn't mean anything. You are not being logical here. If a guy plays more games in a certain decade then he should be picked in that particular decade only.
 

Shri

Mr. Glass
A guy making the debut in a decade doesn't mean anything. You are not being logical here. If a guy plays more games in a certain decade then he should be picked in that particular decade only.
Your point stands if its 99 or something or if a guy played one game in the decade and came back in the next decade after going back domestic cricket. McGrath had an ATG career in the 90s before continuing it in the 00s. You are being deliberately obtuse in addition to being a conniving piece of ****. And it is not the first time either. **** off.
 

jimmy101

Cricketer Of The Year
- 1800's - AndrewB
- 1900's & 1910's - Howe_zat
- 1920's & early 1930's - mr_mister
- late 1930's & 1940's - morgieb
- 1950's - ImpatientLime
- 1960's
- 1970's - The Battlers Prince
- 1980's - kingkallis
- 1990's - Shri
- 2000's - Daemon
- 2010's - Nate

Tendulkar

90s - 1 vote
00s - 1 vote

Vedrict: Deadlock, Tendulkar stays in the 90s

McGrath

90s - 2 votes
00s - 2 votes

Verdict: Deadlock, McGrath stays in the 90s

Gavaskar

70s - 1 vote
80s - 1 vote

Verdict: Deadlock, Gavaskar stays in the 70s
 
Last edited:

Nate

You'll Never Walk Alone
Also, harsh - having now read every post in this thread, I can never forgive you for picking Bracken, giving him one go, then chickening out. You should be ashamed that you were beaten by Lesser Australia, and I wish you ill.
 

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Also, harsh - having now read every post in this thread, I can never forgive you for picking Bracken, giving him one go, then chickening out. You should be ashamed that you were beaten by Lesser Australia, and I wish you ill.
If anything, you should be wishing Ponting ill. Failed the entire time. Lillee was fantastic, better than McGrath. Bracken couldn't possibly have been better. Should have replaced Ponting with Symonds :happy:
 

Nate

You'll Never Walk Alone
If anything, you should be wishing Ponting ill. Failed the entire time. Lillee was fantastic, better than McGrath. Bracken couldn't possibly have been better. Should have replaced Ponting with Symonds :happy:
Bracken > Lee.
 

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Actually should have gone for an attack of Lillee, Lee, and Bracken. McGrath sucked. Both the modern giants sucked. Warne was good though.
 

Nate

You'll Never Walk Alone
Actually should have gone for an attack of Lillee, Lee, and Bracken. McGrath sucked. Both the modern giants sucked. Warne was good though.
Depends what you were after. His economy rate was the best of your bowlers.

Watson WAG.

You know what they say - Lynnsanity is doing the same thing again and again, and expecting different results.

Warne - 28 @ 19.29, 4.48
Watson - 26 @ 16.77, 6.00
Lee - 21 @ 36.57, 6.19
Lillee - 19 @ 25.00, 4.90
McGrath - 12 @ 43.50, 4.14
Hussey - 4 @ 27.50, 5.24
Mallett - 1 @ 91.00, 7.00
Bracken - 0 @ N/A, 6.14 (7 overs bowled)
Bevan - 0 @ N/A, 7.00 (9 overs bowled)
Symonds - 0 @ N/A, 5.76 (21 overs bowled)

You have tainted the Bracken name, and I expect a formal apology.
 

jimmy101

Cricketer Of The Year
If anything, you should be wishing Ponting ill. Failed the entire time. Lillee was fantastic, better than McGrath. Bracken couldn't possibly have been better. Should have replaced Ponting with Symonds :happy:
Ponting did start to come good towards the end. But the AI did begin screwing you with some of its bowling choices
 

Top