Burgey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Good shout. Poor bugger just kept getting castled. Loved Dravid. An absolute faveDravid in Australia 2011/12?
Good shout. Poor bugger just kept getting castled. Loved Dravid. An absolute faveDravid in Australia 2011/12?
Indeed, that's because they forced a frustrated McGrath to bowl more at the stumps & picked him off. I'll never forget how frustrated McGrath's body language was that series, and that's saying a lot.I do remember NZ saying that was their plan but McGrath’s economy rate that series was the highest of any Test series he bowled in from 2000 to 2004 so they weren’t just blocking him all day.
He was never that great at handling bounce off a length. In 99/00 he just got done by great bowling. In 2011/12,while the bowling was really good, it was the manner of dismissals that was sad to watch. Just kept playing around straight deliveries.Re: Dravid in Oz 11/12, that wasn’t even the worst Test series he had in Oz. His 1999/00 series was worse where he averaged almost 10 runs less and had a series strike rate that was the lowest of his career.
In 11/12 he had at least a good innings in Melbourne and fought very hard in the 2nd innings in Perth. 99/00 was just a wipeout.
Yeah. After his 03/04 and 06/07 tours, was sad to see him geting bowled all the time like he did last the last tour here.Re: Dravid in Oz 11/12, that wasn’t even the worst Test series he had in Oz. His 1999/00 series was worse where he averaged almost 10 runs less and had a series strike rate that was the lowest of his career.
In 11/12 he had at least a good innings in Melbourne and fought very hard in the 2nd innings in Perth. 99/00 was just a wipeout.
He only bowled about 10 overs prior to the injury didn't he?Steyn in the recent tour here
Sachin's last few series were also pretty painful to watch. He got owned by Boult, Anderson, Lyon etc. while Pujara and co. were piling on the runs at home.He was never that great at handling bounce off a length. In 99/00 he just got done by great bowling. In 2011/12,while the bowling was really good, it was the manner of dismissals that was sad to watch. Just kept playing around straight deliveries.
You don't think he'd have been dropped if he decided to play on for another 12 months averaging 25 for example?Yeah but he only played on to get the hundredth hundred. He knew they'd never drop him no matter how badly he went. It was pretty selfish imho.
Yeah it was tough to watch. I suspect that's how they would have gone about it IMO if things became too untenable.There's no way he' would ever have been dropped. Might have got a private call and asked to retire, but I severely doubt they'd ever have done so. Just my view as a total outsider, obviously.
Fair point well made.Yeah it was tough to watch. I suspect that's how they would have gone about it IMO if things became too untenable.
BTW, he carried on for a year and a half in Tests after he got his 100th 100. That was just him thinking he was good enough, when he actually wasn't. Happens to many greats. No selfishness involved.