Sue Redfern of England and Jacqueline Williams of the West Indies created history on Sunday for their roles in Oman's 181-run win over Nigeria at ICC WCL Division Five in Jersey. Redfern was one of the two standing umpires, working with Scotland's Alex Dowdalls, in the game while Williams served as third umpire. It marked the first time that two female umpires have officiated in a men's ICC tournament match.
Though multiple female umpires have served in women's ICC tournament matches - Redfern and Williams were two of four female officials at the Women's World T20 Qualifier in Thailand last November and filled standing and third umpire roles respectively in a game between Ireland and Netherlands on the opening day of that event - Sunday was the first time it occurred in a men's ICC fixture. Kathy Cross was the first women's official to stand in a men's ICC tournament match, serving at 2014 ICC WCL Division Five and Three, both held in Malaysia that year.
There just haven't been any really go for it and be good enough. Of course there's no rule against it, or bias against them. If anything you'd think being a female could work for them and get them thrust in (pardon the pun) above their ability level for the sake of having a woman umpire.If a woman meets the criteria and gets into the elite panel, it would be awesome. I don't see any cons in this idea.
lol judging by the general physicality of most women umpires I have come across, it wouldn'tIt would make a bowler's run-up look better on tv.
Polosack one of the atg namesClaire Polosack was third umpire for a chunk of this season's Matador.
well yes, that's exactly what we're trying to do hereHonestly, lets stop this bollocks.
Good point, Charlotte Edwards would be far too inexperienced of international cricket compared to Billy Bowden was at the start of his career.Honestly, lets stop this bollocks. No female has as much cricketing experience or at as high a level as an experienced male umpire. Lets not ask for female positions just because, lets do it on merit.
Pretty sure that might be bull****. If that were true, we wouldn't see women in combat roles in armies around the world I think.Obviously if someone's good enough for the job it shouldn't matter, but (correct me if I'm wrong), but don't women generally have better peripheral vision at the expense of not being able to visually focus on something so well? Might affect their ability to judge lbw's, detect small deviations off an edge etc? No idea if the difference is actually significant in this context, though