• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

New Ratings:Harmison 9th

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
tooextracool said:
2 performances at the oval get marcus trescothick at no 10??tsk tsk
and sachin tendulkar having done absolutely nothing over the last one year except scoring a double hundred on one of the flattest wickets against an ordinary bowling attack gets him to no 9 in the test ratings?

it seems that these ratings are one match dependant..score a big hundred on the flattest pitch in the world and fail for the next 10 matches and ur still in the top 10!:rolleyes:
You've mixed-up the Test and ODI ratings methinks! :P
 

Mingster

State Regular
Langeveldt said:
Probably due to burnout more than anything....
No you're wrong.

Styris was always a batsman who bowled, but the NZ selectors batted him down at 7 or 8. He always batted at 4 or 5 for ND.
 

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
marc71178 said:
And more new ratings sees Steve at 4.
Yes - that one didn't get past me either.

I'm surprised no-one called for him to be dropped following on from his performance in the first 2 sessions of the third test.
 

Top