• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Australia in Sri Lanka 2016

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
It's more suited to accurate but typically innocuous spinners than inaccurate but occasionally dangerous ones because the pitch will make the former more dangerous anyway, but it won't make the latter more accurate.
I would argue however that Smith is probably a more useful part-timer in the context of the attack because he offers something the frontlines don't. The only reason to bowl Voges would be if you wanted to bowl Holland but he was buggered.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I really like when a bowler doesn't go up when he knows its not out like Lyon did there. Good to see. Also makes your real appeals seem more genuine and thus I reckon are more likely to be given out


So many bowlers have never heard of the boy who cried wolf it seems. Really annoys me when they appeal for **** they know isnt out
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
nice way of explaining it


So Smith more likely to bowl an insanely good delivery out of nowhere and dismiss a Root or Williamson(of which the calibre SL don't have), but also more likely to leak 50 runs off 8 overs

got it
Yeah, Smith would be much more useful on a pitch not offering spinners heaps of help because in that situation he could still bowl a genuinely threatning ball while Voges would be very unlikely to. In these conditions though the pitch will turn a lot Voges's innocuous darts into threatening deliveries and go some way to 'fixing' his weakness in a way it wouldn't fix Smith's long hops and full tosses.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Well it didn't cost Starc


Mendis already back down to earth lol

will end up with a career average under 40 for sure
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
A lot of misses seemed to have followed up with a wicket pretty quickly in this Test.

Where are all the people whinging about the pitch like there was in the India series last year? :p
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Well it didn't cost Starc


Mendis already back down to earth lol

will end up with a career average under 40 for sure
Mendis is the only Test batsman to score a ton that is younger than I am. He'll be a gun for a long time.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Same as Voges

nah no chance. If his average dips below 60 it already means he's probably failed too many times to not have been dropped by then. There's also the chance he might just call it quits since he's ancient


basically whether we like it or not statistically Voges will end up one of the greatest test batsmen
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
No point whinging about the pitch. It's still cricket and you need to be able to handle different conditions not just the ones that you're used to or suit your game.

It's getting a bit ridiculous lately though. Aus go overseas and generally lose (except NZ, WI, SA, Eng is close at least), but India/UAE and now SL aus have lost they're latest series comfortably. And every side that comes to Australia gets absolutely thrashed.

You might as well just give the series to the home side and be done with it. The whole "give the toss to the visiting side" instead of actually tossing is starting to look like it has merit.
 

Gnske

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
"Steve Smith's confident! Very confident!"

Cue to Smith looking like some 16 year old trying to figure out how condoms work.
 

Top