One more. Greatest Limited Overs All-Rounder ever, 32 man comp, nomination thread

[Red]

Sachin Tendulkar

 

[OverratedSanity]

Second Tendulkar

 

[StephenZA]

Well if we going down that root of anybody who has bowled a few overs... I nominate Dhoni....

 

[Noble One]

Shakib Al Hasan
Kapil Dev
Heath Streak
Sanath Jayasuriya
Carl Hooper
Jacques Kallis
Shaun Pollock
Imran Khan
Chris Cairns
Shane Watson

 

[mr_mister]

My second batch

Steve Waugh again
Symonds(giving him 5)
Cronje
Cairns
Harris

Qualified so far for the final 32:

Flintoff
Klusener
Watson
Shakib Al-Hasan
Kallis
Kapil
Imran
Jayasuriya
Pollock
Symonds

 

[harsh.ag]

Sachin Tendulkar

 

[OverratedSanity]

Funny how these ****heads roll their eyes at us nominating Sachin (who has 150+ odi wickets by the way) while they themselves nominate Gilchrist.

 

[OverratedSanity]

Has a fifer against Australia

 

[OverratedSanity]

And vs Pakistan

 

[mr_mister]

yeah no way im putting gilchrist in this, or any keeper batsmen for that matter. will screw up what im trying to do

 

[vcs]

Sachin was a pretty useful part-timer in ODIs. I think his stats don't do justice to how handy he could be on several occasions. Not so valuable in Tests, but still had some memorable moments with the ball even in Tests.

 

[harsh.ag]

Has a fifer against Australia

This was such gun bowling by Sachin. Was watching it live and he nailed almost all his overs.

 

[Red]

Funny how these ****heads roll their eyes at us nominating Sachin (who has 150+ odi wickets by the way) while they themselves nominate Gilchrist.

He bowled 2 overs a match. He's not an all rounder.

 

[Red]

yeah no way im putting gilchrist in this, or any keeper batsmen for that matter. will screw up what im trying to do

Gilchrist and Dhoni should both be included before Sachin.

 

[harsh.ag]

He bowled 2 overs a match. He's not an all rounder.

In the matches he did bowl, he was gun. All that stat does is tell us how bad Azhar and Ganguly were at utilizing his mad skillz.

 

[OverratedSanity]

He bowled 2 overs a match. He's not an all rounder.

Gilchrist and Dhoni should both be included before Sachin.

He bowled 2 overs a match more than Gilchrist. I don't think Sachin is that worthy an allrounder at all, but you're being massively hypocritical here. Keepers aren't allrounders

 

[vcs]

He bowled 2 overs a match. He's not an all rounder.

A lot more before his back/elbow issues cropped up. Hardly ever bowled after 2004, and he played 7 years after that.

 

[mr_mister]

if sachin gets 5 noms, he'l get in. and probably lose in round 1


i dont want wicket keeper batsmen in because whether or not they can be classified as all rounders is irrelevant, it'l be too hard to compare keeper batsmen to the bowler/batsmen allrounders

 

[G.I.Joe]

If we were worried about people getting knocked out in round 1, every contest would start off with round 2.

 

[G.I.Joe]

If we were worried about people getting knocked out in round 1, every contest would start off with round 2.

woah that's really deep, man.