Cricket Player Manager
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 32

Thread: All Time Statistical XI

  1. #1
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Mister Wright's Avatar
    Burger Time Champion!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    24,372

    All Time Statistical XI

    This is the All Time XI statistically speaking. To ensure fairness I have set the quota at 50 innings, which means a player would have to play at least 25 matches and with the bowlers the quota is 100 wickets. Note that the statistics are for the batsman in that position and not their career averages. For batsman the batsman chosen is from highest average, and bowler the lowest strike rate.

    1. H. Sutcliffe (Eng) Innings: 83 Runs: 4522 Avg: 61.11
    2. M. Hayden (Aus) Innings: 85 Runs: 4488 Avg: 58.29
    3. D. Bradman (Aus) Innings: 56 Runs: 5078 Avg: 103.63
    4. E. Weeks (WI) Innings: 57 Runs: 3373 Avg: 63.62
    5. S. Waugh (Aus) Innings: 142 Runs: 6754 Avg: 56.28
    6. G. Sobers (WI) Innings: 57 Runs: 2614 Avg: 53.35
    7. A. Gilchrist (Aus) Innings: 57 Runs: 2468 Avg: 60.20
    8. W. Younis (Pak) Wickets: 373 S/R: 43.50
    9. S. Ahktar (Pak) Wickets: 118 S/R: 43.55
    10. S. Barnes (Eng) Wickets: 189 S/R: 41.66
    11. G. Lohmann (Eng) Wickets: 112 S/R 34.20

    Source: Test Cricket Tens
    Last edited by Mister Wright; 24-02-2004 at 08:25 AM.
    Cricketweb Colts Captain



    Quote Originally Posted by Richard
    Hayden > Lehmann
    I'm a member of Club Kerry

    I'm Green

    The color of immortality, nature and envy - you are truly a unique person. While clearly the color of nature, you also symbolize rebirth, fertility and hope in the world. On the other side of the spectrum, a natural aptitude to money with green coming to signify money and possibly even *********!

  2. #2
    U19 Cricketer
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    422
    I don't get how Steve Waugh has ended up with 56........

    Also, whenever i see people do all time XI's that are based on statistics i always think it is somewhat best to leave our guys who played before WWI.

    The batting and bowling averages are much lower than today which makes it very difficult to determine what they would be if put in today's terms......

  3. #3
    International Captain Swervy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    An Aussie with a Lancashire accent living in Keighley,West Yorks
    Posts
    7,360

    Re: All Time Statistical XI

    Originally posted by Mister Wright
    This is the All Time XI statistically speaking. To ensure fairness I have set the quota at 50 innings, which means a player would have to play at least 25 matches and with the bowlers the quota is 100 wickets. Note that the statistics are for the batsman in that position and not there career averages. For batsman the batsman chosen is from highest average, and bowler the lowest strike rate.

    1. H. Sutcliffe (Eng) Innings: 83 Runs: 4522 Avg: 61.11
    2. M. Hayden (Aus) Innings: 85 Runs: 4488 Avg: 58.29
    3. D. Bradman (Aus) Innings: 56 Runs: 5078 Avg: 103.63
    4. E. Weeks (WI) Innings: 57 Runs: 3373 Avg: 63.62
    5. S. Waugh (Aus) Innings: 142 Runs: 6754 Avg: 56.28
    6. G. Sobers (WI) Innings: 57 Runs: 2614 Avg: 53.35
    7. A. Gilchrist (Aus) Innings: 57 Runs: 2468 Avg: 60.20
    8. W. Younis (Pak) Wickets: 373 S/R: 43.50
    9. S. Ahktar (Pak) Wickets: 118 S/R: 43.55
    10. S. Barnes (Eng) Wickets: 189 S/R: 41.66
    11. G. Lohmann (Eng) Wickets: 112 S/R 34.20

    Source: Test Cricket Tens
    yeah these figures do seem a bit wrong...Sobers on 2614 runs..Bradman ave 103.63??????
    rave down, hit the ground


    MSN: djjacksono@hotmail.com

  4. #4
    Eyes not spreadsheets marc71178's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    57,901

    Re: All Time Statistical XI

    Originally posted by Mister Wright
    Note that the statistics are for the batsman in that position and not there career averages.
    :P
    marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!

    Anyone want to join the Society?

    Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.


  5. #5
    International Captain Swervy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    An Aussie with a Lancashire accent living in Keighley,West Yorks
    Posts
    7,360

    Re: Re: All Time Statistical XI

    Originally posted by marc71178
    :P

    ahhhh..well spotted

  6. #6
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Originally posted by hourn
    I don't get how Steve Waugh has ended up with 56........

    Also, whenever i see people do all time XI's that are based on statistics i always think it is somewhat best to leave our guys who played before WWI.

    The batting and bowling averages are much lower than today which makes it very difficult to determine what they would be if put in today's terms......
    WWI is a very poor point.
    Nothing changed in terms of conditions either side. Conditions changed in 1900 or so and 1930 or so.
    There are different periods and you need to be able to differentiate between all of them. But you can make rough comparisons.
    One set of statistics alone are always a very poor way of judging a player's ability.
    RD
    Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourth
    (Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
    chris.hinton: h
    FRAZ: Arshad's are a long gone stories
    RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006

  7. #7
    International Vice-Captain
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    .
    Posts
    4,710
    Wrong average for Gilchrist, too...:P

  8. #8
    International Captain Swervy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    An Aussie with a Lancashire accent living in Keighley,West Yorks
    Posts
    7,360
    Originally posted by Mr. Ponting
    Wrong average for Gilchrist, too...:P
    its his average when he bats at number 7

  9. #9
    Cricket Web Staff Member / Global Moderator Neil Pickup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    26,876

    Re: All Time Statistical XI

    Originally posted by Mister Wright
    Note that the statistics are for the batsman in that position and not their career averages.
    MSN Messenger: minardineil2000 at hotmail dot com | AAAS Chairman
    CricketWeb Black | CricketWeb XI Captain
    ClarkeWatch: We're Watching Rikki - Are You?

    Up The Grecians - Exeter City FC

    Completing the Square: My Cricket Web Blog

  10. #10
    U19 Cricketer
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    422
    Originally posted by Richard
    WWI is a very poor point.
    I think it's pretty clear that averages before WWI are much much lower than in any other period of the game.

    If you compared every other era in the game, performances are generally pretty similar with some eras more favouring bowlers and some more favouring batsmen.

    But the pre-WWI era performances are so much different to any other era (I think only 3 guys averages above 40, and a heap of bowlers averages under 25) it makes them somewhat statistically irrelevant.

    But i do agree that using stats as a pure method of picking these sides is quite silly. They should be used more as a bit of a backup to an opinion......

  11. #11
    International Captain thierry henry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    5,305
    Since when did bowler strike rate become more important than average?

  12. #12
    International Debutant a massive zebra's Avatar
    Eggs Champion!
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    on my ass @ the PC
    Posts
    2,823
    Originally posted by thierry henry
    Since when did bowler strike rate become more important than average?
    Exactly, take this example:

    M Balls Runs Wkts Avge Best 5i 10m SR
    H Verity 40 11173 3510 144 24.37 8-43 5 2 77.5
    DE Malcolm 40 8480 4748 128 37.09 9-57 5 2 66.2

    Malcolm has a considerably better strike rate but only the most ignorant person ever would rank him as a better bowler than Hedley Verity.
    Last edited by a massive zebra; 25-02-2004 at 09:25 AM.
    THE ULTIMATE CRICKET WEB ARCADE EGGS CHAMPION

    RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1990-2006
    RIP Craig Walsh (AKA "Craig"), 1985-2012

  13. #13
    International Captain Swervy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    An Aussie with a Lancashire accent living in Keighley,West Yorks
    Posts
    7,360
    Originally posted by a massive zebra
    Exactly, take this example:

    M Balls Runs Wkts Avge Best 5i 10m SR
    H Verity 40 11173 3510 144 24.37 8-43 5 2 77.5
    DE Malcolm 40 8480 4748 128 37.09 9-57 5 2 66.2

    Malcolm has a considerably better strike rate but only the most ignorant person ever would rank him as a better bowler than Hedley Verity.
    but they are two completely different types of bowler why would you compare them anyway

  14. #14
    International Debutant a massive zebra's Avatar
    Eggs Champion!
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    on my ass @ the PC
    Posts
    2,823
    Originally posted by Swervy
    but they are two completely different types of bowler why would you compare them anyway
    Just to prove that strike rate, while important, should not be the defining factor in selecting bowlers. If the selection is based purely on statistics, average and wickets per match should be the criteria.

  15. #15
    International Captain Swervy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    An Aussie with a Lancashire accent living in Keighley,West Yorks
    Posts
    7,360
    Originally posted by a massive zebra
    Just to prove that strike rate, while important, should not be the defining factor in selecting bowlers. If the selection is based purely on statistics, average and wickets per match should be the criteria.
    oh i agree with you (mostly anyway)...but it depends on what you want a bowler for...if you give the new ball to your opening bowler, many a captain would actually want to have quick wickets (regardless of how many runs are scored) so that maybe numbers 3 4 and 5 are exposed to the new ball...if that is what you want then I would say a bowler who gets wickets quickly but maybe more expensively is your man.

    If you want to be in a position where maybe your main 'wicket taking bowlers are your spinners and really all you want is the opening bowlers is get the shine off but not go for to many runs, you might want someone who is very economical

    So it isnt really as black and white as saying wickets per test or average is the be all....coz it depends

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •