For god sake Ima greeing with you! Nothing gets through!Mingster said:I have no clue what you are on.
There is nothing bad in having a long batting lineup. If Oram has to bat at 9, so be it. Bracewell wants specialists. Players who can get into the team on one facet alone.
So you don't want Oram and Wilson (both selected on bowling) in the team, because it would mean they would have to bat at 8 and 9, and they would 'look' silly? Right...:rolleyes:
Yeah, he should be. He's a better bet for the 4-day NZ 'A' than Matthew Walker in my book.Tim said:One guy who has been in good form this season is Mark Orchard from N.D.
He's nothing flashy with the bat but he looks as though he's got a good head on his shoulders & can chip away 30 or 40 runs.
Today against Canterbury he took 5/10 off 9.3 overs so he can also bowl medium pace quite well.
So he's definately justifying why he was picked for the NZ Academy intake last season.
An outside bet for NZ 'A'?
Sorry, of course. For some reason I still get McIntosh and Fulton mixed up in my mind even after watching them play. I think I just meant it's good to see him dismissing the best-performed batsman still in the comp.Craig said:I thought Fulton is right handed if that what you mean...?
Well I must say, my team is looking a pretty good bet8D Love the squadRichardson
Papps (a better FC player than OD, and he obviously has the selectors favour)
Fleming
Styris (yes, he is the no.4)
McMillan
Cairns
Oram (not one all-rounder too many- Cairns and Oram are both good enough to play and don't unbalance the side at all IMO)
McCullum (YES!)
Vettori
Tuffey
Mason/Martin
What are the pitches scheduled to be like for this series?Kent said:Sinclair.
His innings at Port Elizabeth (150 out of 291 or something?) was against a better SA attack than this, on a pitch that should be similar to the ones we see in this series.