• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

2nd best batsman ever

2nd best batsman ever

  • Hobbs

    Votes: 10 13.7%
  • Hutton

    Votes: 2 2.7%
  • Tendulkar

    Votes: 23 31.5%
  • Lara

    Votes: 3 4.1%
  • Sangakkara

    Votes: 4 5.5%
  • Sobers

    Votes: 17 23.3%
  • Viv Richards

    Votes: 7 9.6%
  • Hutton

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Gavaskar

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 7 9.6%

  • Total voters
    73

Gowza

U19 12th Man
Tough call between Hobbs, Tendulkar, Viv, Sobers and Barry Richards. Graeme pollock couldn't be far off either.
 
Last edited:

Geoffboycott

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
2nd greatest ever is don bradman. Greatest in Jack Hobbs. Greatest 2 batsman since 1970 are 1.geoffrey boycott 2. Sunil Gavaskar
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
My answer to this changes depending on precisely what the question is ('second best batsman' or 'second best Test batsman') and how I'm feeling at the time, but to me it's either Grace, Hobbs, Sobers or Tendulkar.
 

watson

Banned
From 1958 to 1968 Sobers scored 4821 runs at an average of 73.04. That's OK, but he was also able to entertain and pulverise an attack at the same time. Marginally better than the other greats listed IMO.
 

The Battlers Prince

International Vice-Captain
How can he be seen as the 2nd best batsmen if he's only played 4 tests? Cant judge a player after 4 tests, he needed to play many more matches to even be considered as a good batsmen let alone 2nd best to the Don
It's not as though he never played any other matches. Barry Richards hit the ball with such ease its hard to imagine many better honestly.

I'm not particularly sold on anyone as next behind Bradman, similar list of greats as other people really
 

fredfertang

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Youth is, as they say, wasted on the young. You clearly never saw Richards bat, as you wouldn't come up with such nonsense if you had.
 

viriya

International Captain
I can't believe Lara doesn't have a single vote.

Also, are we just focusing on Tests here?
 

Red

The normal awards that everyone else has
Sobers for mine, but as Fred says, sooo many good judges rate Barry Richards the second best of all time that it's hard to ignore. His record in the Supertests gives a bit of an indication of how good he was.

Graham Pollock worth a shout too. Few more chances at test level than Barry Richards and showed he was clearly in the very top tier of all time batsmen. Read a quote from him the other day where he said something like - sure I was disappointed I didn't get a longer test career, but with what was happening in SA at the time we shouldn't have been allowed to participate in world sport - so clearly a good guy too.

Such a shame both those guys didn't play 50+ tests each.
 

Hurricane

Hall of Fame Member
From 1958 to 1968 Sobers scored 4821 runs at an average of 73.04. That's OK, but he was also able to entertain and pulverise an attack at the same time. Marginally better than the other greats listed IMO.
great post.

I voted for him purely because they said in that rest of the world match his boundaries kept rebounding off the fence ten metres back on to field, No one does that today.
Plus six sixes.

I met the man who was hit for six sixes (Malcom Nash I think iirc) it ruined his life and he walked around with a scowl on his face that read "don't ask me about that over". It truly ruined his life. It didn't need to - but he let it ruin it.
 

The Sean

Cricketer Of The Year
great post.

I voted for him purely because they said in that rest of the world match his boundaries kept rebounding off the fence ten metres back on to field, No one does that today.
Plus six sixes.

I met the man who was hit for six sixes (Malcom Nash I think iirc) it ruined his life and he walked around with a scowl on his face that read "don't ask me about that over". It truly ruined his life. It didn't need to - but he let it ruin it.
Having that happen would destroy any bowler for life. I mean, look at Stuart Broad now - total hack.
 

Hurricane

Hall of Fame Member
Having that happen would destroy any bowler for life. I mean, look at Stuart Broad now - total hack.
Yeah I was thinking of Stuart when I made my post.

(Not sure if you are agreeing or disagreeing with my post by the way - which is a good thing - keeps me guessing)

I would suggest that because his effort happened during some slog fest it was soon "forgotten". Nash's six sixes are legendary. I learned about them as a 7 year old. Most 7 year olds would not know about Stuart's over.
 

The Sean

Cricketer Of The Year
Yeah I was thinking of Stuart when I made my post.

(Not sure if you are agreeing or disagreeing with my post by the way - which is a good thing - keeps me guessing)

I would suggest that because his effort happened during some slog fest it was soon "forgotten". Nash's six sixes are legendary. I learned about them as a 7 year old. Most 7 year olds would not know about Stuart's over.
Yeah for sure, Sobers is definitely the most celebrated one from my point of view. Shastri and Gibbs have done it too as well as Yuvraj, but none of the others are as famous as Sobers’ effort.

That being said, ask someone younger than me and/or in a different part of the world, and they may see it completely differently.
 

Chrish

International Debutant
Some accounts mention that Bradman didn't like facing intimidating pace bowling. This is not particularly in regards to bodyline series. A number of English players and commentators noted Bradman's discomfort in playing the short, rising delivery during his 232 in Oval in 1930 series, Larwood mentioned:

"Our sole object was in curbing Bradman because we'd had this experience in 1930 with him; he absolutely murdered us. I think I had one for about 134 at Leeds, something like that. But the wickets rolled very, very slow, terrible slow, and the last time we played at The Oval, there was some rain got on the wicket and the ball was flying about, and I saw Bradman flinching. And I went to Jackson, at the other end, he played like a hero, (a big friend of mine, Archie was) but we all thought that Bradman was flinching. Well we thought, you may disagree, but we thought his leg-side attacking was very open to it. So we thought we'd all give it a go when we were out here, and we were successful with it. And then after we found out that other people were the same, one or two of them, so we kept at it."

Bradman being windy against quality pace bowling: myth or there is some truth in it?

This is a genuine question.
 

Top