Cricket Betting Site Betway
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 84
Like Tree15Likes

Thread: JH Kallis v SM Pollock

  1. #61
    International Coach mr_mister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    13,451
    in that list of all-rounders I made I was gonna post a nifty little bonus stat of the player's gap between their bowling and batting averages, and kind of have that as a separate category. But it makes Kallis and Sobers look so far ahead of Kapil and Hadlee as cricketers it's a little silly
    cricket rules brah

  2. #62
    International Debutant Bijed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    12,472
    Posts
    2,521
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_mister View Post
    recently i realised that batting over bowling rule for all-rounders goes out the window a bit when youre talking about elite batsman. if you average 47 with the bat and 43 with the ball are you an effective all-rounder? food for thought
    Not for me you're not. I think each of your disciplines has to be reasonably close to what you'd consider 'good' for a specialist in that discipline to really be an all-rounder.

    I mean, if George Lohmann had averaged 11-12 with the bat, I don't think many people would be calling him an all-rounder.
    mr_mister likes this.
    Follow me @cricket_gc, should you want to learn more of my cricketing thoughts and opinions, or read them in more detail on my blog: https://gccricket.wordpress.com

  3. #63
    International Coach mr_mister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    13,451
    Well Sobers must be very, very close to missing the cut off for 'good' bowling averages

    Then again that applies to Hadlee with batting


    I guess when you're in the top 5 for batting or bowling of all time the fact you can even hold your own in your other discipline is amazing
    Last edited by mr_mister; 11-10-2017 at 09:11 AM.
    Bijed and zorax like this.

  4. #64
    State Vice-Captain Dendarii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    1,007
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_mister View Post
    in that list of all-rounders I made I was gonna post a nifty little bonus stat of the player's gap between their bowling and batting averages, and kind of have that as a separate category. But it makes Kallis and Sobers look so far ahead of Kapil and Hadlee as cricketers it's a little silly
    It makes sense that it would - while that seems like a natural thing to do it favours the batting all-rounders because the difference in what's regarded as "very good" and "close to good" for batting averages is greater than for bowling averages. So to come up with an effective way of comparing batting all-rounders against bowling all-rounders is tricky, and I doubt whether there's a simple calculation that will do the job.


  5. #65
    International Regular Victor Ian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    here
    Posts
    3,183
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_mister View Post
    in that list of all-rounders I made I was gonna post a nifty little bonus stat of the player's gap between their bowling and batting averages, and kind of have that as a separate category. But it makes Kallis and Sobers look so far ahead of Kapil and Hadlee as cricketers it's a little silly
    It's not straight out batting average >= bowling average that makes an all rounder but batting average is more than everyone batting average > bowling average. everyone batting avergae is somewhere around 30ish so Starc and co are hady batsmen but not all rounders and Stvee waugh was a handy bowler, but not an all rounder.

    As big a fan of Kallis as I am, I think Pollock was the more valuable all rounder, because bowlers win matches. Plus I'm a big fan of Pollock. He was McGrath who could bat
    zorax likes this.

  6. #66
    The Tiger King smalishah84's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    29,686
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_mister View Post
    Well Sobers must be very, very close to missing the cut off for 'good' bowling averages
    I don't know. Sobers has a bowling average similar to Ishant Sharma.
    And smalishah's avatar is the most classy one by far Jan certainly echoes the sentiments of CW

    Yeah we don't crap in the first world; most of us would actually have no idea what that was emanating from Ajmal's backside. Why isn't it roses and rainbows like what happens here? PEWS's retort to Ganeshran on Daemon's picture depicting Ajmal's excreta

  7. #67
    The Tiger King smalishah84's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    29,686
    Quote Originally Posted by Victor Ian View Post
    It's not straight out batting average >= bowling average that makes an all rounder but batting average is more than everyone batting average > bowling average. everyone batting avergae is somewhere around 30ish so Starc and co are hady batsmen but not all rounders and Stvee waugh was a handy bowler, but not an all rounder.

    As big a fan of Kallis as I am, I think Pollock was the more valuable all rounder, because bowlers win matches. Plus I'm a big fan of Pollock. He was McGrath who could bat
    No, McGrath was much harder to get away than Pollock

  8. #68
    Global Moderator Prince EWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Cribbertopia
    Posts
    56,742
    Quote Originally Posted by SeamUp View Post
    Totally different all-rounders who didn't take their other suit seriously enough ?
    I think this is harsh. They both could've been better with their secondary skill if they devoted more time to it, but I think this would've come to the detriment of their primarily skill. There are only so many hours in a day you can practice and so much mental and physical energy you can expend throughout a game, so refinement of natural skills is always going to be zero-sum to some extent. I think they probably made the right calls in what they focused on.
    ankitj and zorax like this.
    Rejecting 'analysis by checklist' and 'skill absolutism' since Dec '09
    'Stats' is not a synonym for 'Career Test Averages'


    Quote Originally Posted by Jeffrey Tucker
    Someone asked me the other day if I believe in conspiracies. Well, sure. Here's one. It is called the political system. It is nothing if not a giant conspiracy to rob, trick and subjugate the population.
    Before replying to TJB, always remember:
    Quote Originally Posted by TheJediBrah View Post
    Next week I'll probably be arguing the opposite

  9. #69
    State Vice-Captain
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The Final Frontier
    Posts
    1,097
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_mister View Post
    in that list of all-rounders I made I was gonna post a nifty little bonus stat of the player's gap between their bowling and batting averages, and kind of have that as a separate category. But it makes Kallis and Sobers look so far ahead of Kapil and Hadlee as cricketers it's a little silly
    Batting AR will generally supersede Bowling AR when this method is used.
    It's because it's easier for a batsman to improve his average ( not outs, almost unlimited runs per match) than it is for a bowler to improve his average (only 20 wickets per match)
    Or put another way, there's a greater span in what's considered a decent-to-good batting average (35-60, diff of 25) than there is similarly for a bowling average. ( 20-35, diff of 15)
    mr_mister and Bijed like this.

  10. #70
    School Boy/Girl Captain
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    India
    Posts
    167
    Kallis was a genuine all rounder.Pollock wasn't all that good with the bat.

    So it's Kallis for me.

  11. #71
    International Coach SeamUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    10,150
    Quote Originally Posted by Prince EWS View Post
    I think this is harsh. They both could've been better with their secondary skill if they devoted more time to it, but I think this would've come to the detriment of their primarily skill. There are only so many hours in a day you can practice and so much mental and physical energy you can expend throughout a game, so refinement of natural skills is always going to be zero-sum to some extent. I think they probably made the right calls in what they focused on.
    You definitely right. I didn't mean it as a critique as such.

    I mean the natural talent they had in their other string was more than enough. They could only put in what they could and give what they could.

    I find Kallis the bowler so interesting. The way he started with hooping away swingers at pace with a big wind up of the shoulders. He lost himself for a couple of years as a bowler and then redefined his action and role that he kept chipping in with wickets for many years and could even still bowl 140 if he wanted to near the end at his age.

    S.Pollock the batsman is also very interesting. He had all the strokes and he was a fast scorer. I always remember having a chat with my old man and that is if he concentrated on his batting and didn't bowl he could have made the Proteas as a batsman - he had that much talent I felt.
    LILLEE c WILLEY b DILLEY

    LAMB c KOURIE b RICE

  12. #72
    State Vice-Captain
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    1,408
    To me, a 5th bowler is much more useful than a no.7/no.8 batsmen scoring runs, so I will go with Kallis.

  13. #73
    Request Your Custom Title Now! OverratedSanity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Elton Chicken Burrah
    Posts
    33,036
    Quote Originally Posted by subshakerz View Post
    To me, a 5th bowler is much more useful than a no.7/no.8 batsmen scoring runs, so I will go with Kallis.
    But a great fast bowler > a great batsman.
    Quote Originally Posted by TNT View Post
    You need to clap a cows c**t over your head and get a woolly bull to f**k some sense into you.

  14. #74
    International Debutant srbhkshk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    :O
    Posts
    2,231
    Really depends on the team need, India would kill for someone like Pollock (Kallis too, but Pollock gives more to a team like India). Pakistan might go the exact opposite.
    vcs likes this.

  15. #75
    State Vice-Captain
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The Final Frontier
    Posts
    1,097
    It is far more difficult for a future cricketer to emulate a Kallis than it is to emulate a S.Pollock.

    All bowlers have to bat and by virtue of this can improve their batsmanship.
    All batsmen don't have to bowl - only those who have the confidence of their captain to throw them the red cherry.

    Thus, from cricket's perspective (as opposed to the team's perspective), Kallis will be remembered much more than S.Pollock in any AR discussion.
    Bijed and zorax like this.

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •