Result was never in doubt.
1.57 at lunch...thought the site was a bit generous and so I put a big amount there - should have probably put 1/10th of that but I was over-confident..I'll never do that againwhat odds did you get? India to win after they had already recovered seemed like it'd be **** odds.
suitable for the conditions and the ball apparently...but we should have had a decent death bowler (like Umesh, if Shami is injured)When I looked at the bowling line up for this tour Kulkarni, Bhuvi, Stuart Binny too many dibbly dobblers in one bowling line up for my liking.
This is true. However, we have a sameness to the attack which is nauseating. Some one taller who could have extracted a bit of bounce like Pankaj Singh maybe. It's easier on the batsmen when you have just the same kind of slower bowlers bowling one after the other.Our entire domestic scene is bursting with dibbly dobbly merchants who cant do much else.. what to do?
Our entire domestic scene is bursting with dibbly dobbly merchants who cant do much else.. what to do?
Pankaj Singh-Umesh Yadav-Ishwar Pandey-Shami (ODI specialist) is the best they can put together. They somehow don't. Dhawal Kulkarni happens to be one of India's best limited-overs bowlers. Wonder what to make of that. Bhuvneshwar may be useful as a lower-order batsman and change seamer, but as frontline strike bowler, can do nothing.This is true. However, we have a sameness to the attack which is nauseating. Some one taller who could have extracted a bit of bounce like Pankaj Singh maybe. It's easier on the batsmen when you have just the same kind of slower bowlers bowling one after the other.