Atherton so incredibly overrated. I don't doubt he was the best option around at the time, but I find it hard to say that it was solely his back to blame for the technical flaws he had. I've never seen anyone before or since with such an alarming tendency to get squared up to a ball just short of a length on or around the off stump. The number of edges to the slips that he gave away as a result of that flaw was astronomical.Athers was brilliant - terrific batsman, decent bowler and hugely entertaining grump - as cpr commented would have broken lots more records without the dodgy back, although he probably wouldn't have been such a miserable ****er
He mostly batted at 5 in a time where that role would be to guide a chase home or finish an innings. Hitting lots of centuries at 5 in ODIs is barely a thing and only a thing of recent times.i think stewart averaged around 45 when opening, compared to his career average of 39.
thorpe clearly the best though for my money.
fairbrother our most overrated odi bat. 1 century in 75 games is poor form.
Scoring 100's for a batsman batting at no.5 or lower (as Neil did for most part of his ODI career) in the 90's wasn't a common phenomenon as it is now.i think stewart averaged around 45 when opening, compared to his career average of 39.
thorpe clearly the best though for my money.
fairbrother our most overrated odi bat. 1 century in 75 games is poor form.
Better than Gilchrist.Loved Nick Knight.
lol noEd Smith should have got more chances.