• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

"If McGrath doesn't step on that ball, we win the Ashes. Probably 5-0"

Stapel

International Regular
Haydos is dreaming if he thinks we could have won 5-0. We might have draw/won the series though. On balance we were outplayed and really only Warne, self-belief and the ability of the lower order to scrap kept us in it.
More or less what I wanted to say. The England attack was all over the Australian batsmen. And Warne arguably had his greatest series ever. Easy to forget in a lost series.
 

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
They would have won 3 tests at the very least, so Hayden, while being a dick about it, is right.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
A fit McGrath wouldn't have helped their lefties learn to play Freddie. Freddie is God. End of
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
He sort-of is, his recon was done with an artificial ligament. 10 years ago a quick who needed a new ACL in their early 30's, Test career over. As it stands, he'll need a replacement in a few years and he's probably worsened the morbidity of the knee but I'd guesstimate that getting the fake ligament has given him 4-5 additional years of Test cricket.
Isn't Harris' issue that he's got **** all cartilage left?

It's not an artificial ligament, they take a hamstring tendon and use that as a ligament. I know, I've had the same surgery done.
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah you're right, dunno why I thought he had the artificial tendon. If only someone would invent some sort of machine where one could input information to search for this stuff.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Why did Harris' knee ligament disappear?

Police caught it holding a joint
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
Yeah you're right, dunno why I thought he had the artificial tendon. If only someone would invent some sort of machine where one could input information to search for this stuff.
Imagine how good he'd be with 2 knees. WAG he is.
 

pardus

School Boy/Girl Captain
5-0 might be overstretching it, especially considering that Australia barely escaped with a draw at Old Trafford, a match in which McGrath played. But I do think Aussies could have defended the Ashes if McGrath played. I was in so much awe of his bowling that psychologically I couldn't help but put an asterix for every team for any of their victories against Australia in his absence.

I remember Aus-SA Test series in 96-97. The series was being hyped as "The Decider". A lot of talk was about how SA would tackle Warne. But I was curious to see how SA would handle McGrath. Needless to say, on the first day of the first Test, McGrath set the tone for the series by knocking off the top 4 SA batsmen (3 of them for less than 10). McGrath's first spell read 10-4-10-3.

Another match I remember well is the 1999 WC super-six match against India. Both teams had come to super-6 at the bottom of their groups, it was a must-win match for both. Aus had suffered severely against Tendulkar in their previous 5 or 6 ODI matches (including the Desert storm). He had scored 3 explosive hundreds in his 3 previous ODI matches against Australia, but with one huge caveat (for me), McGrath was absent in all those matches. In a dazzling display of fast bowling, McGrath removed Tendulkar for a duck in his very first over, and then went on to remove Dravid & Azhar for 2 and 3. He basically broke India's back.

McGrath's ability to turn up his performance for the big matches and against the best batsmen is uncanny.
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
Simply, if McGrath could have contributed to England underachieving in the first innings of Edgbaston, a mental hurdle may well have emerged playing against Australia, and the rest of the series results' that people have mentioned in this thread become irrelevant.

Even the fillip of McGrath stepping on the ball, and then getting the result they wanted at the toss, probably played a part in the group's turnaround - it wasn't so much scoring 400+, it was how.

Flintoff talks about how he didn't find the first Test "fun" and decided he needed to enjoy his cricket in the second Test. If he had have been coming in at 4/80, do you think he would have been thinking about fun at that time?
 
Last edited:

Top