Cricket Betting Site Betway
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 46 to 49 of 49
Like Tree20Likes

Thread: The use of the word "genius" in a sporting context

  1. #46
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    9,851
    And then there's Table Tennis....(like the track too)

    Last edited by watson; 22-09-2015 at 06:53 AM.
    OverratedSanity likes this.

  2. #47
    State Vice-Captain jcas0167's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    1,226
    Great piece of sports writing on Federer from the late David Foster Wallace.

    Almost anyone who loves tennis and follows the men’s tour on television has, over the last few years, had what might be termed Federer Moments. These are times, as you watch the young Swiss play, when the jaw drops and eyes protrude and sounds are made that bring spouses in from other rooms to see if you’re O.K.

    Agassi’s following the shot in to the net at an angle from the backhand side...and what Federer now does is somehow instantly reverse thrust and sort of skip backward three or four steps, impossibly fast, to hit a forehand out of his backhand corner, all his weight moving backward, and the forehand is a topspin screamer down the line past Agassi at net, who lunges for it but the ball’s past him, and it flies straight down the sideline and lands exactly in the deuce corner of Agassi’s side, a winner — Federer’s still dancing backward as it lands. And there’s that familiar little second of shocked silence from the New York crowd before it erupts, and John McEnroe with his color man’s headset on TV says (mostly to himself, it sounds like), “How do you hit a winner from that position?” And he’s right: given Agassi’s position and world-class quickness, Federer had to send that ball down a two-inch pipe of space in order to pass him, which he did, moving backwards, with no setup time and none of his weight behind the shot. It was impossible. It was like something out of “The Matrix.” I don’t know what-all sounds were involved, but my spouse says she hurried in and there was popcorn all over the couch and I was down on one knee and my eyeballs looked like novelty-shop eyeballs.

    Anyway, that’s one example of a Federer Moment, and that was merely on TV — and the truth is that TV tennis is to live tennis pretty much as video porn is to the felt reality of human love.
    ....


    A top athlete’s beauty is next to impossible to describe directly. Or to evoke. Federer’s forehand is a great liquid whip, his backhand a one-hander that he can drive flat, load with topspin, or slice — the slice with such snap that the ball turns shapes in the air and skids on the grass to maybe ankle height. His serve has world-class pace and a degree of placement and variety no one else comes close to; the service motion is lithe and uneccentric, distinctive (on TV) only in a certain eel-like all-body snap at the moment of impact. His anticipation and court sense are otherworldly, and his footwork is the best in the game — as a child, he was also a soccer prodigy. All this is true, and yet none of it really explains anything or evokes the experience of watching this man play. Of witnessing, firsthand, the beauty and genius of his game. You more have to come at the aesthetic stuff obliquely, to talk around it, or — as Aquinas did with his own ineffable subject — to try to define it in terms of what it is not. ..
    ...
    The metaphysical explanation is that Roger Federer is one of those rare, preternatural athletes who appear to be exempt, at least in part, from certain physical laws. Good analogues here include Michael Jordan,(7) who could not only jump inhumanly high but actually hang there a beat or two longer than gravity allows, and Muhammad Ali, who really could “float” across the canvas and land two or three jabs in the clock-time required for one. There are probably a half-dozen other examples since 1960. And Federer is of this type — a type that one could call genius, or mutant, or avatar. He is never hurried or off-balance. The approaching ball hangs, for him, a split-second longer than it ought to. His movements are lithe rather than athletic. Like Ali, Jordan, Maradona, and Gretzky, he seems both less and more substantial than the men he faces. Particularly in the all-white that Wimbledon enjoys getting away with still requiring, he looks like what he may well (I think) be: a creature whose body is both flesh and, somehow, light.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/20/sp...nted=all&_r=1&
    honestbharani and indiaholic like this.

  3. #48
    U19 Vice-Captain
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    goole
    Posts
    562
    Warne & Wasim (If genius means having skill to "do more" compared to contemporaries.. Not necessarily being better than others)

  4. #49
    Cricketer Of The Year Black_Warrior's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    TEF
    Posts
    9,290
    Of course a lot of hyperbole gets thrown around in commentary, and the analysis that follows especially when we have hacks like Healy, Chappel, Bhogle and Warne doing it...but I do believe the term can be legitimately used to describe certain players, and specifically certain acts, in the way they are thought out, planned, and then carried out.
    It is genius because despite all the hard work, perspiration, training, perhaps only 1 or 2 players would be capable of carrying out such an act.

    Akram to Dravid in Chennai 99 was an act of genius.
    "This is a clash of strategy. And of methods, culture and politics. This is a new-era rivalry. Not as ancient as the Ashes, or as passionate as India-Pakistan. Two countries that are so different, yet share rampant egotism, high self-opinion and a belief that being born in their country is superior to other births. This brings together a belligerent bunch of brats, bullies and braggers."- Jarrod Kimber


Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. "Masterly Batting" featured in the Guardian's "The Spin"
    By chasingthedon in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 22-10-2013, 07:25 PM
  2. England, Finals and the "C" word
    By Senile Sentry in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 01-07-2013, 06:33 AM
  3. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 21-09-2004, 02:53 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •