I don't get the Forkers hate. You know he can change his game a bit depending on conditions, right?I don't get the Forkers love. Slower balls and mid wicket slogging doest make a test cricketer.
Agreed but if it is so easy then why cant the vast majority of the cricketers in the world do itI don't get the Forkers love. Slower balls and mid wicket slogging doest make a test cricketer.
He is a Tasmanian. If he can improve his batting too 6 ish territory then he has a solid chance at Watsons spot. Marsh is ahead atm with the selectors but Forkers could slide in front.I don't get the Forkers hate. You know he can change his game a bit depending on conditions, right?
Overall, I feel as though his red ball batting is being underrated. I really do hope Faulkner gets a county cricket gig. He should bat at 4 or 5 and then in his limited matches for Tasmania do the exact same thing. I think he has improved as a Cricketer since the last Ashes in England and he made the squad then.
Not sure if serious.I don't get the Forkers love. Slower balls and mid wicket slogging doest make a test cricketer.
lol wutYou're comparing Steve with Forkers. NSIS
4 correct and obvious statements.He is a Tasmanian.If he can improve his batting too 6 ish territory then he has a solid chance at Watsons spot.Marsh is ahead atm with the selectorsbut Forkers could slide in front.
Not really. Both handy cricketers but young Steve was a batting all rounder who batted top 6 and got test selection at a time when the team wasn't doing well. You seem to feel Forkers should be in the team. Who gets dropped?lol wut
The point should be pretty obvious
Any similarity between Steve Waugh and James Faulkner as players is completely irrelevant to the point I was making. The point was that players can play differently in different forms of the game, and thinking Faulkner couldn't play Tests because you've seen him apply Limited-overs skills really well is just ridiculous.Not really. Both handy cricketers but young Steve was a batting all rounder who batted top 6 and got test selection at a time when the team wasn't doing well. You seem to feel Forkers should be in the team. Who gets dropped?
So weird that in the past week Starc and Faulkner have been compared to Bracken.Batting aside, atm Faulkner strikes me as being a bit like Nathan Bracken, but has the tools to offer more wicket taking opportunities than Bracken if developed correctly and used in the right role.
Gah, Bracken. Cost Inness the Test matches he deserved #never4getwell they compare likes of starc and forkers to bracken cos bracken was a very talented bowler unlike peter siddle.
The domestic stats back O Keefe up, and yeah worst debuts and all that, but does he actually spin the ball? It didn't look like he did against Pakistan, maybe his stats are more to do with domestic Aussie batsmen not been much cop playing spin?Looking at the Australian domestic season stats for the year, is there a particular reason Australia doesn't look more favorably towards Steven O'Keefe? Not complaining about the Fawad selection, hard not to pick him after that season, but he is 33 years old already.
I honestly doubt Nathan Lyon is ever going to be anything more than a mediocre bowler for Australia, if even that, and O'Keefe seems like the way forward for their spin option given he averages 25 overall in FC cricket in the Australian pitches, a place that has hardly been friendly for spinners. Surely one bad game in the UAE doesn't mean his test career his sealed shut (where he outbowled Lyon btw).
It's not like he is an up and coming bowler getting prepped for the right moment either given he is 30 as well. He is also pretty decent with the bat too it seems.
Oh. I thought they'd compare and conclude they were similar because they thought Starc bowled like Bracken and that Faulkner bowled like Bracken. But maybe I'm just a little crazy.well they compare likes of starc and forkers to bracken cos bracken was a very talented bowler unlike peter siddle.
Australia is Australia are the best players of spin actually, even better than India in India. So unless the domestic games turn into like a Mumbai or Dubai, I honestly doubt that. The last time you saw a oversees spinner rip through sides in Australia was back in....The domestic stats back O Keefe up, and yeah worst debuts and all that, but does he actually spin the ball? It didn't look like he did against Pakistan, maybe his stats are more to do with domestic Aussie batsmen not been much cop playing spin?
I like Lyon myself, never going to be Warne, but he has done pretty well, heck he won Australia the first test against india last year, I'd persist with him for now.