• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Jonbrooks chucking Megathread

smash84

The Tiger King
Every law ever made has been correct? Maybe you support countries banning gay marriage then.
If a country is banning gay marriage then that is just the law. It isn't "incorrect". No law is "correct".

You can argue about the (un)desirability of certain laws but you can't call them "correct". There is no such thing as a "correct" law.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
come on, funny is funny, but you all know Pratters is obviously not saying that "Some laws are illegal", but that "some laws are unethical/should be changed"
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Bring in velocity. Without it you are just talking in the air without any proof.p

Velocity of what? Unless you are suggesting fast bowlers and spinners rotate their arms in different directions? What about the slower balls of the fast bowlers then? We ban them too? Again, you are the only one where who is talking without any facts to back it up.
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
The old law didn't want bowlers using the third joint as force because that means a chuck.

Then they said all bowlers bent elbow so started a 15 degree law. So till 15 degrees a bowler can use as much force and 'Chuck'.

The issue is force used, not degrees and it's important to understand this and correct the current laws. Any one who had played cricket understands you cannot bowl the doosra without using the elbow as a force agent. It is not difficult to understand at all but people will continue to not accept it because some how cricket is not as important as prejudices we cloud ourselves with.
 

Shri

Mr. Glass
Forgive me if I don't take seriously a guy who didn't know the difference between anabolic steroids and topical steroid creams.:laugh:
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
The old law didn't want bowlers using the third joint as force because that means a chuck.

Then they said all bowlers bent elbow so started a 15 degree law. So till 15 degrees a bowler can use as much force and 'Chuck'.

The issue is force used, not degrees and it'd important to understand this and correct the current laws. Any one who had played cricket understands you cannot bowl the doosra without using the elbow as a force agent. It is not difficult to understand at all but people will continue to not accept it because some how cricket is not as important as prejudices we cloud ourselves with.

You cannot "bowl" any ball in cricket without using some force from the elbow. Honestly, you are the only one clouding yourself in amazing denial of basic facts such as this.
 

Tom Halsey

International Coach
Oh so it's actually about ethics in cricket bowling.
Pratters has made himself look silly enough on his own in the last hour or two without putting words into his mouth tbf because, whilst I disagree with his point anyway, that's pretty obviously not what he (or TheJediBrah) is getting at.
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
Any one who has played cricket knows they cannot bowl the doosra without using the force of the elbow. I don't have issue with the carrom ball but the doosra has to be outlawed. No two ways about it.
 
Last edited:

Top