Devillier has the ability to show ball the right path, there are two ways to do so, 1. form where the ball is coming, 2 where the ball is going to
Amla can just hit the ball harder with the use of timing and strock
Devilliers is younger so he will learn with the passage of time
Devilliers plays in all the situations and conditons while all amla is a powerplay player
Devilliers takes all the pressure on himself, while amla puts the pressure on his partner and starts hitting fours
So Devillieris can be said as better
Nonsense. Amla destroyed Australia at Perth in a way few batsman can. And he's played his share of high pressure knocks. Honestly many more than AB.ABD for me.
Devilliers is very flexible with the way he plays.He can score at run a ball without breaking a sweat and then accelerate at will.That is one area where i find Amla to be not so good i.e accelerating the scoring. Also,ABD has shown time and again that he can thrive under pressure which can't be said about Amla.
This is all bollocks.Devilliers is very flexible with the way he plays.He can score at run a ball without breaking a sweat and then accelerate at will.That is one area where i find Amla to be not so good i.e accelerating the scoring. Also,ABD has shown time and again that he can thrive under pressure which can't be said about Amla.
I was referring to ODI cricket to be specific.Nonsense. Amla destroyed Australia at Perth in a way few batsman can. And he's played his share of high pressure knocks. Honestly many more than AB.
Care to explain?This is all bollocks.
So on CW we have this increasingly oft-written "rule"/convention, which is that if it doesn't say T20s or ODIs in the original post or thread title, then it's about Tests exclusively.I was referring to ODI cricket to be specific.
Care to explain?