LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksWhat's in a Name?
Having a famous father is one of the greatest handicaps that a budding international sportsman can have. In this feature Martin tells the story of a man who, briefly, looked like he might throw off the shackles
.jpg)
What's in a Name?
Having a famous father is one of the greatest handicaps that a budding international sportsman can have. In this feature Martin tells the story of a man who, briefly, looked like he might throw off the shackles
Glenn Trimble faced a fairly similar outlook having to live up to his fathers name. Also Trevor Chappell for his brothers and grandfather.John Benaud for his brother. And Brett Lees brother whose name escapes me at present
Keep Your Feet on The Ground,Keep Reaching for The Stars!
Guessing Arnie Sidebottom wasn't a big enough name to suggest Ryan bucked the trend?
"All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusions is called a philosopher." - Ambrose Bierce
Langeveldt: I of course blame their parents.. and unchecked immigration!
GingerFurball: He's Austrian, they tend to produce the odd ****ed up individual
Burgey: Be careful dealing with neighbours whose cars don't have wheels but whose houses do.
Uppercut: Maybe I just need better strippers
Mohinder Amarnath bucked the trend reallyOriginally Posted by cpr
"Cricket is an art. Like all arts it has a technical foundation. To enjoy it does not require technical knowledge, but analysis that is not technically based is mere impressionism."
- C.L.R. James
Fred, I love to read your articles but I have to question this parta) Did all 49 have children?Of those 49 none produced offspring who went on to even begin to match their fathers achievements
b) Did they all have boys?
c) I think it should have included the words "on the cricket field" re: matching fathers achievements.
fixed
Cheers mate, I can now sleep soundly tonight.
I like the sentence as it is. Add a clarification and it loses some of it's emotional impact because the reader is meant to think - "49 greats and no legacy, SHAME!".
The fact that the reader doesn't put 2 and 2 together and conclude that some of the offspring must have been girls is neither here nor there. And certainly not the writers fault who is duty bound to squeeze as much 'poetic licence' into his work at possible.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote