Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: What's in a Name?

  1. #1
    Cricket Web Staff Member fredfertang's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Normal service resumed
    Posts
    17,491

    What's in a Name?

    What's in a Name?

    Having a famous father is one of the greatest handicaps that a budding international sportsman can have. In this feature Martin tells the story of a man who, briefly, looked like he might throw off the shackles

  2. #2
    International 12th Man JBMAC's Avatar
    Mahjong Champion! 3 Card Poker Champion!
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Qld/Australia
    Posts
    1,569
    Glenn Trimble faced a fairly similar outlook having to live up to his fathers name. Also Trevor Chappell for his brothers and grandfather.John Benaud for his brother. And Brett Lees brother whose name escapes me at present
    Keep Your Feet on The Ground,Keep Reaching for The Stars!

  3. #3
    cpr
    cpr is offline
    International Coach cpr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    #BantheGLC
    Posts
    12,144
    Guessing Arnie Sidebottom wasn't a big enough name to suggest Ryan bucked the trend?
    "All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusions is called a philosopher." - Ambrose Bierce
    Langeveldt: I of course blame their parents.. and unchecked immigration!
    GingerFurball: He's Austrian, they tend to produce the odd ****ed up individual
    Burgey: Be careful dealing with neighbours whose cars don't have wheels but whose houses do.
    Uppercut: Maybe I just need better strippers

  4. #4
    International Coach weldone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Kolkata->Mumbai->London
    Posts
    12,267
    Quote Originally Posted by cpr View Post
    Guessing Arnie Sidebottom wasn't a big enough name to suggest Ryan bucked the trend?
    Mohinder Amarnath bucked the trend really
    "Cricket is an art. Like all arts it has a technical foundation. To enjoy it does not require technical knowledge, but analysis that is not technically based is mere impressionism."
    - C.L.R. James


  5. #5
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend NUFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Marrickville
    Posts
    22,100
    Fred, I love to read your articles but I have to question this part
    Of those 49 none produced offspring who went on to even begin to match their fathers achievements
    a) Did all 49 have children?
    b) Did they all have boys?
    c) I think it should have included the words "on the cricket field" re: matching fathers achievements.

  6. #6
    Cricket Web Staff Member fredfertang's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Normal service resumed
    Posts
    17,491
    Quote Originally Posted by NUFAN View Post

    c) I think it should have included the words "on the cricket field" re: matching fathers achievements.
    fixed

  7. #7
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend NUFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Marrickville
    Posts
    22,100
    Cheers mate, I can now sleep soundly tonight.

  8. #8
    Cricketer Of The Year watson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    9,452
    I like the sentence as it is. Add a clarification and it loses some of it's emotional impact because the reader is meant to think - "49 greats and no legacy, SHAME!".

    The fact that the reader doesn't put 2 and 2 together and conclude that some of the offspring must have been girls is neither here nor there. And certainly not the writers fault who is duty bound to squeeze as much 'poetic licence' into his work at possible.
    1. Len Hutton 2. Jack Hobbs 3. Walter Hammond 4. Peter May 5. Ken Barrington 6. Denis Compton 7. Alan Knott 8. Hedley Verity 9. John Snow 10. Fred Trueman 11. Sydney Barnes



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •