'the low-scoring partner in a century partnership for the 10th wicket.'
It's pretty clear.
Yeah but now I see the semantics more clearly. For some ridiculous reason if the phrase had said 'lower-scoring partner' then I would have picked Sachin straight away. Must be my strange brain.
I am often asked who was the best, fastest or toughest bowler I ever faced and I quite enjoy giving different answers every time. Well, it keeps me amused anyway –but the underlying point is that one could revise this whole list on a daily basis and never really be right and never really be wrong - DAVID GOWER
I'm not mad. Stop projecting, Howe.
Last edited by watson; 18-08-2014 at 01:25 AM.
BTW, I think we have had all formats before in the same draft. The "Decades Draft" that had a player from all decades since the 1880s, in that the rule was performances across all formats would be considered not just tests. I played that one so I thought if nothing is specified it means all formats count.
Yeah, Howe's got it right Well done. I was waiting for that to get picked up.
~ Do you think I care for you so little that betraying me would make a difference ~
Aldo, great pick. I didn't specify, so my bad I guess
Morgieb - Glenn McGrath
Watson - Courtney Walsh
Bagapath - John Snow
G.I.Joe - Wilfred Rhodes
ohnoitsyou - Chris Cairns
Howe_zat - Sachin Tendulkar
AldoRaine18 - Michael Holding
Clause - Pick a player who was the low scoring partner in a century partnership for the 10th wicket.
Oh well, the running myth on CW that it's Tests only unless stated otherwise is well and truly busted. It really isn't "genius" when you decide to go against established tradition. There's a reason Harsh wasn't questioned about it before, and it wasn't because no one else thought of it.
Hey, guys, I am not a 100% about this. I didn't mean to include ODIs, and as such, I do think Aldo's pick is a little iffy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)