68Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks'the low-scoring partner in a century partnership for the 10th wicket.'
It's pretty clear.
'the low-scoring partner in a century partnership for the 10th wicket.'
It's pretty clear.
What if all the switches get stuck on 'destroy'?
Ok then.
Michael Holding.
1st ODI: England v West Indies at Manchester, May 31, 1984 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo
Wait, we're doing ODIs too?
Athlai doesn't lie. And he doesn't do sarcasm either, so you know it's true!Originally Posted by Athlai
'You will look very silly said Mr Salteena with a dry laugh.
Well so will you said Ethel in a snappy tone and she ran out of the room with a very superier run throwing out her legs behind and her arms swinging in rithum.
Well said the owner of the house she has a most idiotick run.'
It wasn't specified in the clause that it was only tests.
Genius
ITT: People being mad they didn't think of things
My bad then. I actually looked at Sachin in that Test match and went "I can't pick Sachin because Zaheer has the lower score of the two batsman - 248 v 75".
Yeah but now I see the semantics more clearly. For some ridiculous reason if the phrase had said 'lower-scoring partner' then I would have picked Sachin straight away. Must be my strange brain.
1. Len Hutton 2. Jack Hobbs 3. Walter Hammond 4. Peter May 5. Ken Barrington 6. Tony Greig 7. Ian Botham 8. Alan Knott 9. John Snow 10. Fred Trueman 11. Sydney Barnes
I'm not mad. Stop projecting, Howe.
This I do disagree with at we've never mixed Test stats with ODI stats before. It's either one or the other. Aldo has just set a CC precedent.
But if everyone else is happy then I'm happy. Can't criticise someone too much for breaking tradition.
Last edited by watson; 18-08-2014 at 01:25 AM.
Sorry to create a confusion, I will change the pick if harsh makes it tests only. Since it wasn't specified anywhere so far, I took the liberty to consider all formats.
BTW, I think we have had all formats before in the same draft. The "Decades Draft" that had a player from all decades since the 1880s, in that the rule was performances across all formats would be considered not just tests. I played that one so I thought if nothing is specified it means all formats count.
Yeah, Howe's got it rightWell done. I was waiting for that to get picked up.
~ Do you think I care for you so little that betraying me would make a difference ~
Aldo, great pick. I didn't specify, so my bad I guess
Thanks.
Round I
Morgieb - Glenn McGrath
Watson - Courtney Walsh
Bagapath - John Snow
G.I.Joe - Wilfred Rhodes
ohnoitsyou - Chris Cairns
Howe_zat - Sachin Tendulkar
AldoRaine18 - Michael Holding
Weeman27bob -
Clause - Pick a player who was the low scoring partner in a century partnership for the 10th wicket.
Oh well, the running myth on CW that it's Tests only unless stated otherwise is well and truly busted. It really isn't "genius" when you decide to go against established tradition. There's a reason Harsh wasn't questioned about it before, and it wasn't because no one else thought of it.
Hey, guys, I am not a 100% about this. I didn't mean to include ODIs, and as such, I do think Aldo's pick is a little iffy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote