• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Would you pick Stuart Broad as a bowler alone?

Adders

Cricketer Of The Year
Stuart Broad at the top of his mark, ready to bowl his first ball of the Test...

:laugh:

This was exactly my first thoughts when I heard he was going to bowl in a mask.........Hannibal's coming for your liver Vijay.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I guess people are missing the question. If I've understood it correctly, he's basically asking if Broad should play if he can't bat, meaning we would finish both innings 9 down
Yeah; "couldn't bat" in the most literal sense. Not just "batted like Anderson".

As long as playing didn't risk further injury to a greater extent than 'normal' and he could still field, I'd still play him.
 

Blocky

Banned
I would - the reality is he's a proven match winner for them when he gets it right, is coming off a six-fer within an innings and has looked much better this season than recently.
 

SteveNZ

Cricketer Of The Year
Cannot fathom how he would be able to bowl with a busted nose but not bat with it. If he's at a level where he can run in effectively without major pain/loss of coordination, he can face up and swat a few. Back away if you have to, he did it all summer in Australia.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Cannot fathom how he would be able to bowl with a busted nose but not bat with it. If he's at a level where he can run in effectively without major pain/loss of coordination, he can face up and swat a few. Back away if you have to, he did it all summer in Australia.
I agree; I see this purely as a hypothetical.
 

Blocky

Banned
Cannot fathom how he would be able to bowl with a busted nose but not bat with it. If he's at a level where he can run in effectively without major pain/loss of coordination, he can face up and swat a few. Back away if you have to, he did it all summer in Australia.
He's English and a bit of a ponce - that's the issue.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
If your specialist batsmen can't make enough runs to win the game on their own, you probably don't deserve to win it anyway. Your batsmen bat and your bowlers bowl; any crossover in skills is just a really nice bonus.
Eh, probably agree with the rest of your post but this is somewhat idealistic and not really true.
 

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Yeah, and yes, this does mean that bowlers in today's game are far more important than the bats. They bat and clean up the **** behind batting collapses well too. And the team which does that best usually wins.

Philander, Bhuvi, Ashwin, Siddle, Vettori, Broad worth their weight in gold.
 

91Jmay

International Coach
I reckon I'd play him just about, being 9 down at the end of each innings would cost us around 40 runs (at a guess) but our tail bats deep anyway and we are so starved of wicket takers.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Unless I'm mistaken, doesn't he have a track record of pulling up lame after one innings in quite a few tests now?
Also called having injury problems sure

He's played through injury all of this summer btw
 

Blocky

Banned
Also called having injury problems sure

He's played through injury all of this summer btw
Yup, because it's not like almost every fast bowler ever has injuries that they bowl through - Ask Dale Steyn about playing through pain - mid test.
 

91Jmay

International Coach
Yup, because it's not like almost every fast bowler ever has injuries that they bowl through - Ask Dale Steyn about playing through pain - mid test.
You're trying a bit to hard now. The subtle troll posts are better.
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
Ah the good ol Hamiltron $5.50 lady of the night. Distinctly 'more downs gone' than the $5 variety.
 

Blocky

Banned
Ah the good ol Hamiltron $5.50 lady of the night. Distinctly 'more downs gone' than the $5 variety.
Well you do pay a premium for repeat quality now don't you...

But seriously, Broad isn't what I'd call the toughest kid out there when it comes to playing through pain, and we've seen more than one little temper tantrum from him which indicates he's hardly the Dale Steyn school of "I really don't care how my body feels, I'm here to murder you with a piece of leather and stitching"
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Apropos of nothing...

Similar Threads

Stuart Broad
By flibbertyjibber in forum Cricket Chat
Replies: 8
Last Post: 31-07-2011, 05:13 AM

Ishant Sharma vs Stuart Broad - Test bowler
By Sir Alex in forum Cricket Chat
Replies: 109
Last Post: 30-06-2011, 03:24 AM
Good times
 

Top