Is JimmyGS greater than Bradman?

[KiWiNiNjA]

The stats.

Test Average
Bradman 99.94, JimmyGS 100.00

Conclusion.

Y.E.S!

 

[Jono]

I saw JimmyGS live and I never saw Bradman so I'm not sure he ever existed.

Voting yes.

Edit: Wait, no... hell yes.

 

[hendrix]

obviously.

 

[Athlai]

Jimmy can bowl too.

 

[GIMH]

Bradmans lack of posts at CW leaves him falling short too

 

[G.I.Joe]

Footage of Bradman playing is far too grainy to be explained as anything more than a poorly executed hoax.

 

[ohnoitsyou]

This is just so gun.

 

[Flem274*]

Footage of Bradman playing is far too grainy to be explained as anything more than a poorly executed hoax.

I'm sure someone has tried to seriously argue that in the past.

 

[Dan]

The real question is whether JimmyGS is greater than Steve Tikolo.

Yes, IMO.

 

[G.I.Joe]

I'm sure someone has tried to seriously argue that in the past.

I think it was maximus0723. I can't recall if he was serious or just taking the piss.

 

[KiWiNiNjA]

Stats update.

Test Average
Bradman 99.94, JimmyGS 170.00

JimmyGS is 1.7 times better than Bradman.

Centuries : Tests
Bradman 0.55, JimmyGS 1.00

JimmyGS is 1.8 times better than Bradman

CW Posts
Bradman 0, JimmyGS 856

JimmyGS is infinity times better than Bradman.

 

[Spikey]

he is still only ranked as a First Class Debutant

 

[KiWiNiNjA]

he is still only ranked as a First Class Debutant

Well, he is a Debutant of the highest class!

 

[OverratedSanity]

Wait what he was a member on CW? Haha that's awesome

 

[Adders]

Wait what he was a member on CW? Haha that's awesome

Yeah wat?? Tell us more you blokes........was he an active poster?? Was he a ****??

 

[lockton2skipper]

more importantly is Jimmy Neesham better than Corey Anderson ?

 

[NasserFan207]

more importantly is Jimmy Neesham better than Corey Anderson ?

Possibly a more promising batsman, have to say though I don't see his bowling ever doing too much

 

[Flem274*]

haha, interesting you say that since consensus seems to be Anderson is going to be the better batsman but Neesham is going to be the better bowler.

jimmyGS called Richard insane once. He also trolled Richard's first chance average the other evening. what a lad.

 

[NasserFan207]

haha, interesting you say that since consensus seems to be Anderson is going to be the better batsman but Neesham is going to be the better bowler.

jimmyGS called Richard insane once. He also trolled Richard's first chance average the other evening. what a lad.

Haha, well he's one of my fav players now just for that.

 

[Viscount Tom]

haha, interesting you say that since consensus seems to be Anderson is going to be the better batsman but Neesham is going to be the better bowler.

jimmyGS called Richard insane once. He also trolled Richard's first chance average the other evening. what a lad.

Plenty of people. I can absolutely gurantee you that if you find a similar question posed (ie, "did <player who took 5-for-a-few in chase of 270> make a massive difference?") you'll find a non-unanimous verdict.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again. You are absolutely insane.

Ta dah