I'm sure someone has tried to seriously argue that in the past.Footage of Bradman playing is far too grainy to be explained as anything more than a poorly executed hoax.
I think it was maximus0723. I can't recall if he was serious or just taking the piss.I'm sure someone has tried to seriously argue that in the past.
Well, he is a Debutant of the highest class!he is still only ranked as a First Class Debutant
Yeah wat?? Tell us more you blokes........was he an active poster?? Was he a ****??Wait what he was a member on CW? Haha that's awesome
Possibly a more promising batsman, have to say though I don't see his bowling ever doing too muchmore importantly is Jimmy Neesham better than Corey Anderson ?
Haha, well he's one of my fav players now just for that.haha, interesting you say that since consensus seems to be Anderson is going to be the better batsman but Neesham is going to be the better bowler.
jimmyGS called Richard insane once. He also trolled Richard's first chance average the other evening. what a lad.
haha, interesting you say that since consensus seems to be Anderson is going to be the better batsman but Neesham is going to be the better bowler.
jimmyGS called Richard insane once. He also trolled Richard's first chance average the other evening. what a lad.
Ta dahPlenty of people. I can absolutely gurantee you that if you find a similar question posed (ie, "did <player who took 5-for-a-few in chase of 270> make a massive difference?") you'll find a non-unanimous verdict.I've said it before, and I'll say it again. You are absolutely insane.