• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

English spinners

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Rik said:
He did, being lined up as the next Tuffers :)
This was Tuffers the Cricket player, not Tuffers the media dahling wasn't it?!

That said, it was a breath of fresh air to hear the Cat on TMS in Sri Lanka - Very humorous, and he knows what Test Cricket's about as well!
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Rik said:
The problem is that if the "variation" costs you more runs than a seamer, then I would pick the seamer.
Personally I would go for an extra batsman ahead of a 5th seamer if you haven't got a spinner.

And if the extra batsman can bowl a few overs of spin, all the better now Vaughan refuses to use himself.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Rik said:
And Schofield was picked due to showing that he could take wickets with sharp-turning deliveries, a strike bowler who would cost you runs but if he got it right would be unplayable. I hope he gets his confidence back.
I too hope he gets it back, but playing for Lancashire and seeing them give Carl Hooper the ball in preference to you must be quite depressing at times.

And I thought he was picked more on potential as he's a leg spinner than anything else, but I may be mistaken.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
krkode said:
I'm not sure how he is in real life, but Michael Davies of Northamptonshire is good as hec in ICC :wow:

So is Jason Brown from the same team...
Brown took Davies' place.
Davies had a good 1999, but then he lost it, as discussed.
Neither of them were\are anything special, that's what must be remembered, but they were\are better than other fingerspinners around. They have the benefit of playing on the best surface for bowling spin in the country.
Neither are as good as Croft and Giles.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
SpaceMonkey said:
I believe Gavin Hamilton got the Yips last year for Yorkshire and just COULDNT bowl the ball properly, although i hear he's got over the problems and is fit for the comming season.
He's never been unfit, he's just never been quite good enough as a batsman to earn a place on that alone.
Gav got the yips in 2002, not 2003, and played only a couple of games in the 2 seasons.
Sadly we didn't give him much of a chance, and we found it neccesary to release him.
He's decided to go closer to home (he is a Scotsman). Durham are a lucky lot if he gets his bowling and batting back to it's best, because he's a brilliant player.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Craig said:
Well I believe you must play your best bowlers (you have to be flexible though) and I can assure you mate it will bring up the "variation" agruement.
Rik said:
The problem is that if the "variation" costs you more runs than a seamer, then I would pick the seamer.
You pick your best bowlers, for me, simple as. Always remember that best is tailored to the conditions, but never pick "the spinner".
Only in the subcontinent, and possibly West Indies, are conditions typically suitable for any decent fingerspinner to be better than a decent seamer.
Trouble is England only have 2 or 3 decent fingerspinners (one having retired) and no seamers at present who are certainly decent.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
iamdavid said:
Note where I said "with a bit of work" , namely improving his control , he turns the ball a lot & he's got a good temperament , not scared to toss it up & buy a wicket.

:lol: :lol:
Worst specialist spinner in England , mate there are some very , very poor spinners in England , Schofield is no world beater , but he has potential.
Believe me, Space, david is right. Schofield mightn't be the ritz most of the time, but there are plenty worse. Indeed, there are plenty worse Worldwide. So far there is little evidence that Doherty doesn't fall into that category!
Schofield simply can't string it together very often, but he has, for me, shown his potential quite clearly.
 

SpaceMonkey

International Debutant
He needs to sort out his action. Its too 'messy' arms everywhere...the beauty about Warne / Murli is that they have good repeating actions that are identicle 99% of the time. Where as Schofield you watch him bowl and i doubt he has the same action more than 3 times an over.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Interesting... I've never noticed a problem.
Not the most rhythmical of actions, but no problem with the repetition.
 

iamdavid

International Debutant
Yes , that little challenge you & I had regarding Doherty & White.

posted by DavidYes I am willing to stick my neck on the line , give it two seasons (provided they both play regularly for their respective states) & I would be willing to bet that not only will both their records improve drastically but at least one of them will be either on the fringes of international cricket or already playing.
Lets wait until March 2005 (provided we are still both on here) and then we will see who was right.
posted by RichardOkey. Challenge accepted.
Well, I haven't actually said "I think you're definately wrong" - from what I've heard of White, he's got the makings of a decent bowler in any conditions. Though if your description of him as Kumble-like is true, he possibly could struggle away from the subcontinent.
But if you think Doherty will be a bowler with a good record in two years' time, I'm perfectly willing to say I don't think he will - purely and simply because he is a fingerspinner playing in Australia.
This still stands :) :P
 

Neil Pickup

Cricket Web Moderator
Bienvenue Scott. How long did it take to think up that username? :)

That makes three Essex boys now. Un-oh ;)

You're not a Manure fan too, are you?
 

Rik

Cricketer Of The Year
marc71178 said:
I too hope he gets it back, but playing for Lancashire and seeing them give Carl Hooper the ball in preference to you must be quite depressing at times.

And I thought he was picked more on potential as he's a leg spinner than anything else, but I may be mistaken.
He was picked on potential and the fact he was taking wickets with unplayable deliveries at an average of under 30, and could bat.
 

Top