Would rank them equally
Murali was a marginally better bowler, but Tendulkar was a lot better batsman.
WWCC - Loyaulte Mi Lie
"People make me happy.. not places.. people"
"When a man is tired of London, he is tired of life." - Samuel Johnson
"Hope is the fuel of progress and fear is the prison in which you put yourself" - Tony Benn
#408. Sixty three not out forever.
I think we both know one of them will be remembered for their elbow. Tendulkar's got very high when driving, a pleasure to watch.
Parmi | #1 draft pick | Jake King is **** | Big Bash League tipping champion of the universeCome and Paint Turtle
Sachin seems friendlier so I will go with that reason which seems as good as any other in this comparison.
I got great enjoyment shouting "WHY THE **** ISN'T THIS GAME BEING PLAYED AT THE BASIN?!>!?!?" to reasonably significant cheers from the sparse crowdOverrated XI Warner, Rutherford, Steve Smith, Rahane, Bairstow, Alecz Day, Donovan Grobelaar, Luke Ronchi, Faulkner, Dan Christian, Permaulone day NZ will bring chappell to his knees in a puddle of his own tears and you'll see Phlegm on his belly greedily tasting every delicious tear before watching the hope fade from that old ****s eyes.
It's a difficult comparison to make and say someone is better. Both outstanding cricketers. Tendulkar carried Indian batting for a few years in the 90s. Sri Lanka would be virtually non-existent in Test cricket without Muralidaran.
Let's be honest, they still are virtually non-existent as a test country. Had some good players like Murali, Aravinda, Jaya and Sanga, but for the most part they've always been a joke, especially away from home.
I mean, hand on heart, when has any supporter from a decent test playing nation ever felt remotely threatened by the prospect of their side hosting Sri Lanka for a test series?
Last edited by Burgey; 14-10-2013 at 03:55 AM.
I mean, the last Australian summer was ruined by having Sri Lanka here after South Africa.
Entree served as main course is always disappointing.
Yeah, but I don't think it helped that it is was the 3rd time in 4 years (I think) that Sri Lanka had toured Aus.
I guess as harsh as it is there is some merit in your comment Burgey. But the top 3 or 4 can't keep playing each other over and over, the lower tier (and I'm not really sure SL deserve to be in that category, but anyway) need to be encouraged and supported.
I guess the best thing Sri Lanka have going for them now (post Murali) is that they are still competitive at home, and it is one of the best cricketing tours for any supporter to go on so they get decent crowds.
No doubt that they are very poor now. Herath is the only Test quality bowler they have.
Yeah fair dos to both of ye.
Having said that, they did win a Test match in South Africa. I think they were the last team to win a Test against SA. Can't recall SA losing a match since that Boxing Day Test.
I know what you're saying, but if we're still saying "yay, a test match country won *a* test against someone", then I kind of think it shows that country is a bit of a joke. You should be pissed off if you aren't winning series after 30 odd years as a test nation, surely.
It's like they're the Gold Coast Suns of cricket, without Gary Ablett.
Last edited by Burgey; 14-10-2013 at 04:59 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)